Defense Verdict Returned in Latest Xarelto Bleeding Lawsuit

A Philadelphia jury has found in favor of Bayer and Johnson & Johnson in the latest “bellwether” trial over the drug makers’ alleged failure to warn about the risk of internal bleeding from Xarelto, returning a defense verdict in a case brought by a New Jersey man. 

The case was the latest in a series of early trial dates scheduled, which are being closely watched to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that may be repeated throughout about 20,000 Xarelto lawsuits filed on behalf of individuals nationwide.

At least four prior trials in state and federal courts have resulted in defense verdicts, including a Philadelphia trial that originally resulted in a $28 million verdict, before a Pennsylvania judge overturned the verdict during post-trial motions. All cases are currently pending on appeal, and the parties are preparing hundreds of additional cases to go before juries in the coming months and years.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Xarelto (rivaroxoaban) was introduced in 2011, as the second member of a new class of drugs known as novel oral anticoagulants. The drugs were were marketed as easier to use than warfarin, which had been the go-to anti-clotting treatment for decades. However, as an alarming number of adverse event reports involving severe and often fatal bleeding problems began to emerge, a mounting number of lawsuits began to be filed against the drugs manufacturers.

Each of the claims raise similar allegations involving uncontrollable gastrointestinal bleeding, brain bleeds or other injuries that occurred after doctors were unable to stop hemorrhaging among users of Xarelto. Plaintiffs claim that the drug makers provided false and misleading information for consumers and the medical community, failing to adequately warn about the risks associated with their medication.

On Friday, the Pennsylvania state court jurors in this latest bellwether case found that plaintiffs failed to establish that the Xarelto label warnings were inadequate.

Most of the cases pending nationwide are in the federal court system, where the Xarelto litigation has been centralized before U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon in the Eastern District of Louisiana, where the parties have been directed to prepare 1,200 Xarleto cases to be prepared for trial.

If the parties fail to reach Xarelto settlements or another resolution for the claims, the drug makers may soon face simultaneous trial dates in courts nationwide.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims
Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (Posted today)

Two Special Masters have been appointed to organize and manage a court-supervised mediation program that may resolve Bard hernia mesh lawsuits that do not participate in a global settlement announced last month.