Truvada Lawsuit Filed Against Gilead Over Unlawful Scheme To Maintain Uncompetitive Pricing of HIV Drug

Gilead illegally bribed a generic competitor to delay a competing version of the blockbuster HIV drug Truvada, according to a class action lawsuit filed by investors in the drug manufacturer.

The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on September 17, presenting claims for the Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust, as well as other similarly situated investors.

The Truvada lawsuit outlines an alleged scheme between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Cipla Ltd. and Cipla USA, which claims Gilead bribed Cipla not to release a generic version of Truvada, instead giving them a license to product a lesser known HIV drug, Atripla, or providing them a license to produce Hepatitis C drugs in India.

HIV DRUGS LAWSUITS

Did you suffer kidney injuries or bone fractures on Truvada or other TDF-based HIV drugs?

Gilead HIV drugs Truvada, Atripla, Stribild, Viread and Complera have been linked to increased risks of kidney and bones injuries, which lawsuits allege may have been avoided if safer formulations had not been withheld by the manufacturer.

Learn More See If You Qualify For Compensation

According to the complaint, this allowed Gilead to continue selling Truvada at premium prices without generic competition.

The class action lawsuit, and others like it, note that Gilead constructed a web of joint development agreements, preventing its co-conspirators from competing against Gilead’s tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) based drugs.

Truvada, however, is the flagship of this family of HIV drugs. In addition to its role as an HIV treatment, Truvada is also the go-to preventative HIV treatment, known as pre-exposure prophylaxix (PrEP).

The lawsuit is the latest in a growing number of claims filed against Gilead, claiming the company acted unscrupulously and illegally to keep profit margins high on its HIV drugs.

In addition to sweetheart deals made with competing drug companies to stifle competition. Critics say Gilead also held back the release of a safer formulation in order to maximize profits from Truvada and similar drugs until the patents ran out.

Gilead faces a growing number of individual Truvada lawsuits filed by users of the HIV drug who have experienced bone and kidney problems caused by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) contained in the medication.

Those plaintiffs claim that Gilead knew about a safer alternative in 2004, known as tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), which is used in Descovy and other drugs introduced in recent years, yet held off on development of the newer drugs until Truvada and other TDF-based drugs started facing generic competition.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in MDL
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in MDL (Posted yesterday)

A proposal has been submitted for a group of 12 lawyers involved in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits to serve in various leadership positions in the litigation, which involves dozens of claims that the implants were defectively designed, leading to fractures, migration and infections.