Class Action Over Toyota Hybrid Brake Problems Allowed To Proceed By Court

A federal judge has rejected an attempt to dismiss a class action lawsuit against Toyota, which alleges hundreds of thousands of Prius, Camry and Avalon and other hybrid vehicles were sold with defective braking systems prone to intermittent failure, placing passengers and drivers at risk of an auto accident.

The complaint (PDF) was originally filed over the Toyota hybrid brake problems in February 2020, presenting claims on behalf of owners of certain 2010 through 2015 Toyota Prius and Prius PHV, 2012 through 2015 Toyota Prius V, 2012 through 2014 Toyota Camry Hybrid, and 2013 to 2015 Toyota Avalon Hybrid vehicles that contain the defective braking systems.

Problems with Toyota brake booster pumps have been reported for several years, with the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) having recorded numerous statements from customers indicating the brakes on their Toyota vehicle consistently locked up, causing the vehicle to unexpectedly lunge forward or failing to engage when the brake pedal is depressed.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

The NHTSA also became aware of multiple accidents and injuries arising from the brake problems in certain Toyota vehicles.

On July 20, 2020, Toyota filed a motion to dismiss the class action complaint, arguing that the lawsuit did not contain sufficient facts to maintain the claims.

In an order and opinion (PDF) issued last week, U.S. District Court Judge Amos L. Mazzant denied the motion, allowing the Toyota class action lawsuit to proceed forward.

“After reviewing Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Motion, the response, the reply, the sur-reply, and the arguments of counsel, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged sufficient facts to state claims for relief under the various asserted theories,” Judge Mazzant determined.

The complaint accuses Toyota of placing profits before the lives and safety of hundreds of thousands of drivers and passengers whose brakes are defective, but must wait for the potentially life-threatening brake booster defect to occur before the manufacturer will address it.

According to one plaintiff named in the lawsuit, North Carolina resident Lois Felts, she was involved in a single vehicle collision on December 21, 2019, resulting from the brakes on her 2013 Toyota Camry failing to engage while driving at a low rate of speed.

According to Felts, she continuously applied the brakes but the vehicle would not stop, causing the vehicle to continue across a three-lane highway and crash into a curb. Felt’s reported her insurance carrier determined the vehicle a total loss.

Several other members of the class claim to have suffered financial losses after paying for brake services at dealerships throughout the timeframe Toyota denied the problem.

Despite several years and many other similar complaints of brake booster problems, Toyota failed to issue an recall, and has chosen to only extend the warranty and make repairs on vehicles that have experienced a brake failure, which could result in injuries or even deaths that could otherwise be avoided.

The lawsuit presents claims of breach of warranties, false advertisement, illegal sales practices, fraudulent concealment, unfair and deceptive trade practices, unjust enrichment and various other allegations on behalf hundreds of thousands of impacted vehicle owners across the nation.


61 Comments


  1. Manuel

    I also have experience the brake booster failure of my 2011 Prius even had an accident on frwy and still paying for the repairs and my Prius being a total loss not able to drive it while deemed safe to drive by a Toyota dealership, as my whole engine shakes erratic please help I am a great person that has also became a financial victim to Toyota corporation


  2. Ting

    I am a 2012 Prius V owner. I have the same issue(traction light, ABS, slip indicator). At first, I took my car to a mechanic near me. They gave me an error code C1391 and told me they could not fix it. They suggested I bring it to the dealership. When I picked up my car, the lights were off. Everything worked fine. I dropped off my car at the dealership and told me an error code was detected (I gave them the exact number). After an hour, they told me the problem was I did not install the floor mat properly and charged me $166. After 5 days, the same problem happened again! So I looked for the information and I just realized it is a manufactural defect.

    I am so mad because the dealership did not tell me about this issue which they’ve already known and they still told me everything was fine. I feel it’s ridiculous.


  3. Mark

    My 2008 Lexus RX 400h lights lit up as well with the code: C1391 and the cost to repair it is about $3000. What happened to the law suit. Appreciate any response. This looks like Toyota’s hybrid mess impacting several Toyota and Lexus models going back to 2006.


  4. LG

    I have a Prius 2013 Persona, just a little over $150K. Over the weekend, the ABS, Brake, Traction lights came on out of nowhere. Took it to local dealership, was told it is a brake booster/cylinder problem. They knew (Toyota and Dealers) something was wrong with the system. However it was not addressed earlier. If Toyota does not cover their known failure; I am not going to spend another dime on Toyota cars. Maybe they do not care about my dollars. I just wanted to share the information so other owners can be aware of this ONGOING issue and stay SAFE on the road.

    How can I join the suit?


  5. Bradley

    My 2013 Prius just suffered from a brake booster failure. The technician at my local dealership told me about the CSP that Toyota had in place to replace the part. So I called the brand engagement center for help. Unfortunately for me, my brake booster failed 2 months after their “voluntary warranty extension” expired therefore they will not help me with the cost to repair it. In other words, Toyota will not foot the bill for a $500 part and would rather me go into debt to pay the $2500 to repair it myself or take the risk of me dying while driving my car.


  6. BENJAMIN

    I purchased my 2013 Toyota Prius that had about 61k miles on it in May 2023 (not knowing anything about the known defective brake boosters and brake pumps on Toyota Prius 2010-2015 and other vehicles) and on 10/22/2023 my vehicle lost brake pressure and (after diagnosing with my OBD II reader) the DTC 1391 presented itself.

    I contacted Toyota within 5 days to report the problem and no one at TMC is willing to help since my 10 years or 150,000 miles which ever comes first expired on 5/21/23 and Toyota shows ZERO concern for their consumers and or the safety of the public. The FTC needs to hold Toyota liable for their violations to the Magnuson- Moss Warranty Act and Toyota’s implied warranty on their products, Toyota refuses to recall a defective brake booster and pump but instead chooses profits or people and hides under a guise of caring about creating a positive Toyota experience by voluntarily excluding several unsuspecting customers with a CSB which does not fix or recall the defective parts unless certain DTC codes can be verified by their Dealership’s who generally gaslight and refuse to honor the replacement.

    My experience with Toyota is appalling because their Executive Office has zero empathy or understanding. Why isn’t the NHTSA reopening an investigation into this known issue.
    Toyota will continue to make defective products until they’re held accountable because planned obsolescence of their parts is a business model for this Japanese manufacturer, who no longer cares about their brand, since they are a multinational corporation who cares more about profits than people. May God deal with their organization.


  7. Cynthia

    My brake booster went out on my 2013 Prius. Toyota refused to fix it. I was 250 miles and 10 days out of warranty.
    Toyota was just horrible! Even charged me $175. To tell me!


  8. Sydney

    I purchased a used Toyota Prius 2012 C4 and the brake booster failed after about 5 months of driving. I talked to a Toyota dealership and they told me I was
    over the mileage requirement for the free replacement, and there was nothing they could do. The part is extremely expensive. If I drive it as is, the detriment to my safety and others could be at risk. Because the Booster assembly is so expensive I cannot afford the part. Therefore it boils down to what should I do drive it or walk?


  9. London

    I bought a Highlander which throws itself forward when breaking. I have hit numerous curves. This is a very big safety issue and i’m very disappointed in toyota


  10. D

    2008 highlander hybrid having the same issues also there are 2 prius in my drive way only one has the same issue. They need their socks sued off for the fact that its a known issue and they refuse to correct the problem and produce the same garbage.

    Beyond unsafe.


  11. Patricia

    I have a 2013 Prius which has 120,000 miles and has been very maintained. My Prius also has the code 1391. I’m under the mileage but as I understand it past the date of 2023 to get this repaired by Toyota. The reason I bought a Toyota is because my first Toyota Corolla lasted to 286,000 miles. I won’t buy another Toyota again.


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

In the six months since a Bard hernia mesh settlement agreement was reached, at least two dozen new lawsuits have been brought, as the implants continue to fail and require revision surgery.
As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025.
Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.