Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
Verdict in Topamax Birth Defect Lawsuit Upheld on Appeal March 23, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments The Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld an $11 million verdict returned in a product liability lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen Pharmaceuticals, which alleged the drug maker failed to adequately warn about the risk that side effects of Topamax use during pregnancy may cause children to suffer cleft lip and other birth defects. The ruling stems from a November 2013 verdict in a Topamax cleft lip lawsuit filed by Haley Powell, whose son suffered facial malformations following use of the anti-seizure drug during pregnancy. As a result of the birth defects, the child has required multiple surgeries, which has left him with permanent deformities and disabilities. The panel of appellate judges rejected an argument by Johnson & Johnson that the lawsuit was pre-empted by federal law and that the plaintiffs were unable to establish a link between Topamax and birth defects. Learn More About Topamax Lawsuits Side effects of Topamax during pregnancy linked to birth defect risk. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Topamax Lawsuits Side effects of Topamax during pregnancy linked to birth defect risk. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The Court found that the plaintiffs proved that Janssen failed to provide adequate label warnings on Topamax regarding the risk of cleft palate, cleft lip and other birth defects associated with use of the anti-seizure drug during pregnancy. The judges determined that it was reasonable for the jury to find that if Powell’s doctor been adequately warned, it is likely she would not have been prescribed Topamax while pregnant. Johnson & Johnson also attempted to attack the $11 million damage award, arguing that the judgment was excessive. However, the appeals court found that the award demonstrated that the jury was informed and educated. Topamax Pregnancy Risks Topamax (generic topiramate) is a medication approved for treatment of epilepsy, migraines and for weight loss. It was first approved by the FDA in 1997, and has been widely available as a generic since 2006. While Johnson & Johnson has maintained that adequate Topamax warnings were provided about the potential pregnancy risks, the FDA required the drug maker to update the label information in March 2011, warning about a potential link between Topamax and oral cleft birth defects when the medication is used during the first trimester of pregnancy. The FDA has urged doctors to avoid giving Topamax to pregnant women or women who are of child-bearing age and at a high risk of pregnancy. Oral cleft birth defects include cleft palate and cleft lip, which occur when parts of the lip or palate fail to completely fuse together. The defect results in the child being born with defects as small as a notched lip to extreme as an open groove that goes from the roof of the mouth to the nose. Cleft palate and cleft lip can cause problems eating and talking and can increase the risk of ear infections, resulting in the need for corrective surgery. The Powell case was one of three early test trials involving lawsuits over Topamax birth defects that went before juries in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Please, with each resulting in multi-million dollar damage awards. In April 2014, the drug maker reached an agreement to settle at least 76 complaints, although details of the Topamax settlement were not disclosed at that time. Tags: Birth Defects, Cleft Lip, Epilepsy, Epilepsy Drug, Johnson & Johnson, Pennsylvania, Topamax Image Credit: | More Topamax Lawsuit Stories Epilepsy Drug Pregnancy Risks Linked to Major Birth Defects and Congenital Malformations: Study June 19, 2019 Elavil, Topamax Side Effects Outweigh Benefits For Treating Child Migraines: Study January 17, 2017 Side Effects of Topamax, Wellbutrin May Increase Glaucoma Risk: Study July 16, 2015 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 3 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024) Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024) BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 5 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)
Epilepsy Drug Pregnancy Risks Linked to Major Birth Defects and Congenital Malformations: Study June 19, 2019
Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 3 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)
Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024)
BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 5 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)