Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Tesla Recalls Nearly 240,000 Vehicles Due to Rearview Camera Failure: NHTSA More than 800 warranty claims have been made regarding Tesla vehicles failing to display rearview images, increasing the risk of crashes or injury to bystanders. January 13, 2025 Darian Hauf Add Your Comments Federal highway safety officials have issued a recall affecting 239,382 Tesla vehicles due to a potential defect in the computer circuit board, which could cause the rearview camera to fail, significantly increasing the risk of an auto accident. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced the Tesla rearview camera recall on January 8, warning that certain 2023 through 2025 model year Tesla vehicles may be equipped with a computer board that could short circuit, resulting in the loss of rear view functionality. Backup cameras have become a critical safety feature over the past decade, providing drivers with a clear view behind their vehicles to help prevent accidents. Since May 2018, federal regulations have required all new motor vehicles under 10,000 pounds to include rearview cameras. However, when backup cameras fail to function properly, they can significantly increase the risk of accidents involving pedestrians, other vehicles or stationary objects. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION While the NHTSA report does not attribute any accidents or injuries to the defect, officials indicate there have been at least 887 warranty claims and 68 field reports related to the recall. Tesla first became aware of the issue on November 21, 2024, after identifying an increase in the number of car computer replacements linked to shorting failures in the primary or secondary power components. Between November 26 and December 20, 2024, Tesla conducted an investigation into the issue and determined it was linked to software versions released before 2024.44.25.3 or 2024.45.25.6. According to the investigation, these earlier software versions, combined with colder temperatures, could cause an increase in reverse current, potentially leading to power component shorting during startup. The investigation concluded on December 27, 2024, prompting the manufacturer to initiate a voluntary safety recall for 2023–2025 Tesla Model X and Model Y vehicles, as well as 2024–2025 Tesla Model 3 and Model S vehicles. Tesla began providing a free over-the-air software update on or shortly after December 18, 2024, to adjust the vehicle’s power-up sequence and prevent shorting failures. Customers will also receive notification letters starting March 7, 2025. No further action is required for owners unless their vehicle is already experiencing a shorting condition. For vehicles affected before installing software version 2024.44.25.3, 2024.45.25.6 or later, Tesla will replace the car computer free of charge. Tesla’s number for this recall is SB-25-00-001. Customers may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752 or the company’s contact for this recall, Sarah Shiver, via email at sarah.shiver@dot.gov. Owners with any additional questions can also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.nhtsa.gov. Tesla Self-Driving Investigations Earlier this month, a Tesla “Smart Summon” feature investigation was initiated by NHTSA, following 16 accidents caused by defects in the full-self-driving system, which was designed to control Tesla vehicles via a mobile app. However, the system failed to detect obstacles, leading to collisions that posed risks of property damage and potential injury. Prior to this month’s investigation, a previous Tesla self-driving investigation was launched in October 2024, following four pedestrian accidents, including one fatality. The investigation involved Tesla vehicles using Full Self-Driving features in areas with reduced roadway visibility, including conditions caused by sun glare, fog and dust. In addition, a wrongful death lawsuit was filed against Tesla late last year, which claimed that the company misrepresented the safety of its Autopilot feature. The lawsuit alleged that although Tesla portrayed Autopilot as a safe and fully autonomous driving system, its deficiencies led to the death of a 33-year-old man after his Tesla collided with a fire truck. The family claimed that the company’s misrepresentation caused their child and brother to trust the Autopilot feature, which failed to detect the emergency vehicle. Tags: Autonomous Vehicles, Backup Camera, Rearview Camera, Self-Driving Car, Tesla, Tesla Autopilot Image Credit: Shutterstock: Vitaliy Karimov More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order April 1, 2025 Judge Rejects J&J’s Third Bankruptcy Filing, Killing $9B Talcum Powder Settlement April 1, 2025 Igloo Cooler Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fingertip Amputation Risks April 1, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025) Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)