Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
St. Jude Medical To Pay $16M to End Defibrillator Kickback Probe January 25, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your Comments U.S. prosecutors say that St. Jude Medical paid doctors as much as $2,000 per patient to convince them to have the company’s pacemakers and defibrillators implanted, and the company has agreed to pay $16 million to settle the illegal kickback allegations. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the St. Jude settlement agreement on January 20. According to the DOJ’s claims, St. Jude used three post-market studies and a medical device registry as cover for payments to doctors to entice them to implant their heart devices in patients. The company solicited physicians to participate in the studies to get them to stop using competitor products and to continue to implant their patients with St. Jude-manufactured devices, including pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), the DOJ alleged. Do You Know About… Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION In a press release issued the same day the settlement was announced, St. Jude claimed that the post-market studies and registries were legitimate clinical studies used to gather important scientific data. The company said that the settlement is not an admission of guilt and that it agreed to the terms to avoid the cost of lengthy and expensive litigation. The probe came as the result of a whistleblower lawsuit filed by Charles Donigian, who will receive a $2.64 million share of the settlement. Under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, whistleblowers who report a false claim against the government may be entitled to receive a portion of any money that the government recovers from the offenders. In return, the whistleblower must be the first to bring the case to the government’s attention, and must not publicize the claim until the DOJ decides to prosecute the claim. The St. Jude whistleblower settlement is the second settlement this month involving an implantable defibrillator medical device manufacturer. Last week, a federal judge accepted a guilty plea and $296 million settlement from Guidant over claims that it tried to cover up problems with defective ICDs. The company also agreed to a three-year probation sentence which will come with increased regulatory scrutiny into its devices and practices. Tags: Defibrillator, ICD, Medical Device, Qui Tam, St. Jude, Whistleblower Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Suboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage March 11, 2025 Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals March 11, 2025 3M Seeks Dismissal of More Than 100 Bair Hugger Infection Lawsuits March 11, 2025 4 Comments Latonya March 2, 2011 I truly don’t understand about this whole situation. I for had a St.Jude defbrillator that caused me damages.The ICD pokes whole in my heart,delivered unwanted shocks ,blood poison and staff infection I had to have opened heart surgery for the removal of the generator the riata lead is still embedded in my heart without possible removal. the lead came detached from the generertor.I mad as the devil because I can’t get any help I’m 27 years old and have two kids that I scared evenutally i going to die what am I to do . Jarrod March 29, 2011 This is one crazy story, doctors being paid by St. Jude Medical to implant defribrillators to install their device. Its all about money with these doctors and medical companies. I had a St. Jude device implanted in my chest of October 2006, and the date was the 13th. It fired of one day while I was showering. That was the beginning of 2010. Back in Feburary of this year, 2011. I had to have CPR done three different times to bring me back to life, simply cause the defribrillator didn’t work as it should have. No lawyer I contact won’t even take my case. When I heard of this lawsuit, I figure I need to get invovled in this, since I almost lost my life three times, cause the St. Jude device didn’t fire like its suppossed to. I thank God that He was there to save me, when a man made device, St. Jude, failed to fire off when I needed it most. Maurice July 29, 2011 I had a St. Jude Pacemaker implanted on 7/31/09 at Ohio Valley Heart Care, in Evansville, Indiana, by Dr. Crevey. How do I find out if he accepted a kickback ? When I went in for a device check, the technician told me that the doctors implant different devices into different people. (I ignorantly assumed that the hospital used only St. Jude.) The technician informed me that the doctors use the devices of the companies which gives them the best sales pitch. That statement bothered me. It sounded as though the doctors are on the take; that they go to the highest bidder; which ever company greases their palms the best. What a damn racket ! Doctors, literally, gambling with our health; which we lay in their hands. Not only are there needed heavier fines and penalities on the companies, but the doctors need to be punished, perhaps, through the loss of the medical licenses. LATONYA December 12, 2011 HAVE ANY ONE HEARD ABOUT THE ST.JUDE DEFIBATTOR IMPLANT LAWSUIT AOR IS IT LOST FORVER… Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage (Posted: yesterday) Suboxone lawyers will meet today with a federal judge, to discuss the status of thousands of tooth decay lawsuits brought over the opioid treatment film strips. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITMedical Records of Suboxone Tooth Decay Must Be Produced Under MDL Court Order (02/20/2025)Lawyers in Suboxone Dental Lawsuits Fail To Reach Agreement on Bellwether Selection Process (02/06/2025)Another Influx of Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits Expected in Coming Months (01/20/2025) 75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (Posted: 2 days ago) The MDL Judge will hear presentations from Depo-Provera lawyers seeking leadership positions during a two day hearing on March 13th and 14th, as a growing number of women continue to file brain tumor lawsuits against the makers of the popular birth control shot. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)Depo-Provera Injury Lawyers To Apply for Leadership Positions in MDL (03/03/2025)Judge Selects Five Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits for “Pilot” Trials Weeks After MDL Established (02/25/2025) Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 5 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)
Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals March 11, 2025
Suboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage (Posted: yesterday) Suboxone lawyers will meet today with a federal judge, to discuss the status of thousands of tooth decay lawsuits brought over the opioid treatment film strips. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITMedical Records of Suboxone Tooth Decay Must Be Produced Under MDL Court Order (02/20/2025)Lawyers in Suboxone Dental Lawsuits Fail To Reach Agreement on Bellwether Selection Process (02/06/2025)Another Influx of Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits Expected in Coming Months (01/20/2025)
75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (Posted: 2 days ago) The MDL Judge will hear presentations from Depo-Provera lawyers seeking leadership positions during a two day hearing on March 13th and 14th, as a growing number of women continue to file brain tumor lawsuits against the makers of the popular birth control shot. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)Depo-Provera Injury Lawyers To Apply for Leadership Positions in MDL (03/03/2025)Judge Selects Five Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits for “Pilot” Trials Weeks After MDL Established (02/25/2025)
Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 5 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)