Boehringer Ingelheim Ordered to Pay $1.25M For Failure to Warn About Pradaxa Bleeding Risks

A federal jury in West Virginia has determined that Boehringer Ingelheim should be required to pay $1.25 million in compensation to the family of a woman who suffered fatal gastrointestinal bleeding due to the side effects of Pradaxa, raising similar allegations to those presented in a number of other claims over the controversial, new-generation blood thinner.

The wrongful death lawsuit was brought by the family of Betty Knight in May 2015, alleging that the drug manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings about the Pradaxa bleeding risks to the medical community and to consumers.

Knight began taking the medication in October 2011, for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. According to evidence presented at trial, she suffered uncontrollable bleeding in May 2013, and died on September 2, 2013.

Do You Know About...

Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry

Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods.

Last week, a jury in the Southern District of West Virginia determined that Boehringer Ingelheim should compensate Knight’s family $50,000 for medical expenses and $200,000 in pain and suffering, then added an additional $1 million in punitive damages, which are designed to punish the drug maker for failing to warn about the risks associated with their anticoagulant.

At one time, Boehringer Ingelheim faced more than 4,000 Pradaxa bleeding lawsuits, each involving similar allegations that individuals suffered severe and fatal bleeding events while using the medication, which was introduced in October 2010 as a superior alternative to warfarin. However, while the decades-old anticoagulant warfarin has a known and effective reversal agent, allowing doctors to control and stop bleeds that may occur during use, Pradaxa was introduced without an approved antidote, leaving many doctors helpless to treat bleeding patients who were prescribed the new anticoagulant.

Following several years of consolidated proceedings in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), Boehringer Ingelheim reached a Pradaxa settlement agreement that resolved most cases in 2014. However, the Pradaxa wrongful death lawsuit filed by Knight’s family was not settled, and a number of similar claims are still pending nationwide.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women
Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (Posted yesterday)

Women across the U.S. are now pursuing product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims to secure compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects linked to the use of Depo-Provera.

Court Asked To Establish Valsartan Settlement Fund and Appoint Administrator
Court Asked To Establish Valsartan Settlement Fund and Appoint Administrator (Posted 2 days ago)

The judge presiding over the federal Valsartan lawsuits has been asked to approve the creation of a qualified settlement fund, as well as appoint an administrator and custodian for funds that will be paid to former users of the recalled hypertension drugs who have developed cancer.