Pradaxa Overdoses, Hemorrhages Continue Among Older Patients: Report

The controversial blood thinner Pradaxa may have been responsible for another 117 deaths during the second quarter of 2011, according to a new report on problems submitted to the FDA.

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) released their quarterly report (PDF) earlier this week on adverse event reports submitted by consumers and healthcare provides throughout the United States between April and June 2011.

Pradaxa (dabigatran) holds the dubious title of being associated with more reported cases than any other regularly monitored drug, even though the anticoagulant had been on the market for less than a year at the time.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

According to the ISMP, Pradaxa was associated with 856 reports of serious, disabling or fatal injury in the second quarter of 2011, including 117 patient deaths on Pradaxa and 511 cases of Pradaxa bleeding events.

Most of the reported hemorrhages involved patients over 80 years old, reinforcing the group’s concerns over the risk of Pradaxa overdoses among older users, since the medication has a “one-size-fits-all” dose.

Pradaxa (dabigatran) was introduced by Boehringer Ingelheim in the United States in October 2010, as a superior alternative to Coumadin (warfarin) for prevention of strokes among individuals with atrial fibrillations. It is the first approved anticoagulant from in a new class of medications, known as “direct thrombin inhibitors,” which inhibit the enzyme in the blood that causes blood to clot.

These medications are promoted as superior alternatives to Coumadin/warfarin because they require less monitoring.  However, while users of warfarin who suffer internal bleeding can be treated with Vitamin K to counter the blood thinning effects, Pradaxa and the other newer blood thinners in the same class do not have a quick fix, often referred to as a reversal agent.

While many prescribing doctors have adopted Pradaxa because it requires less follow up visits from their patients to monitor blood levels, emergency room physicians and other experts have raised substantial concerns about their inability to treat Pradaxa overdoses, hemorrhages or other bleeding events that do occur, increasing the seriousness of such events.

Concerns over deaths linked to Pradaxa has sparked safety investigations in the U.S., Europe and Canada. An increasing number of people throughout the United States are also now pursuing a Pradaxa lawsuit, alleging that the drug maker failed to adequately research the medication or warn about the serious and potentially life-threatening side effects.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Change Healthcare Data Breach Settlement Talks To Be Explored Early in MDL
Change Healthcare Data Breach Settlement Talks To Be Explored Early in MDL (Posted yesterday)

Court has ordered parties to meet separately with a U.S. Magistrate Judge over the next two months, to discuss the best timing and structure for settlement negotiations to resolve Change Healthcare data breach lawsuits.

Motion Filed To Centralize Depo-Provera Lawsuits in Federal MDL Over Brain Tumor Risks
Motion Filed To Centralize Depo-Provera Lawsuits in Federal MDL Over Brain Tumor Risks (Posted 2 days ago)

A group of plaintiffs have petitioned the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate all Depo-Provera lawsuits before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.