Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
FDA Indicates Recalled Philips BiPAP Machines Pose Risk of Serious and Life-Threatening Injury Volatile organic compounds found in the recalled Philips BiPAP machines can enter users’ airways, putting them at risk of serious injury or death, according to an FDA update that categorized the problems as a Class I recall. September 28, 2022 Russell Maas Add Your Comments The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced this week that it has classified a Philips BiPAP machine recall issued last month as a Class I medical device recall, suggesting that exposure to the toxic chemicals released by plastic components in the motor may cause serious injuries or death. Consumers were initially warned about the recalled Philips BiPAP machines on August 29, when the regulatory agency alerted patients, caregivers and healthcare providers that several models of breathing machines may be equipped with plastic in the motor which was contaminated with a non-compatible material, which could release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) directly into the air pathways and users lungs. In an update posted on September 26, the FDA categorized the recall as a Class I, which is the most serious designation that the agency can apply, suggesting continued use of the recalled Philips BiPAP machines poses a substantial risk of serious adverse health consequences, including fatal side effects. Philips BiPAP Recall Lawsuits Did you or a loved one suffer side effects after using a recalled Philips BiPAP machine? CONTACT A LAWYER The recall includes approximately 386 Philips A-Series BiPAP A30 (Ventilator), A-Series BiPAP A40 (Ventilator), A-Series BiPAP V30 (Auto Ventilator) and OmniLab Advanced+ models, which are used in both at-home and clinical environments, such as hospitals and sleep laboratories. The devices were distributed from August 6, 2020, to September 1, 2021. Defects with the Philips BiPAP may cause toxic VOCs to enter the lungs, causing a variety of symptoms including headache, dizziness, and irritation in the eyes, nose, respiratory tract (airway), and skin, hypersensitivity reaction, immune system reactions, nausea or vomiting, and toxic cancer-causing effects. Philips CPAP Recalls The reclassification of the BiPAP recall comes as the manufacturer is still reeling from problems which led to a recall of several million Philips CPAP, BiPAP and ventilator machines distributed between 2009 and April 2021 issued last year. Some of the recalled Philips BiPAP machines were also included in this earlier action, which impacted machines distributed with a PE-PUR sound abatement foam found to break down over time, releasing toxic black particles into the air pathways, tubing, mask and users lungs. Thousands of Philips CPAP/BiPAP lawsuits are already being pursued following this 2021 recall, including allegations that users were left with various types of cancer, lung damage and respiratory side effects. Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* Δ Learn More Following the initial warnings about the sound abatement foam problems in June 2021, free replacement CPAP and BiPAP machines were not offered by the manufacturer, and Philips did not provide users the funds to buy a new sleep apnea machine, leaving them without much-needed breathing assistance. It was not until September 2021 that a Philips CPAP machine repair program was announced, which was initially expected to take up to a year to fulfill. However, one year later the manufacturer has failed to meet their deadlines. In August 2022, the FDA issued an update on side effects from recalled Philips CPAP, BiPAP and ventilators, indicating it has received more than 69,000 adverse event reports involving problems associated with the foam particles, including 124 deaths. Following the Philips BiPAP recall first announced last month, the agency has not indicated how many of those problems may be related to toxic chemicals released by plastic components in the motor. October 2022 Philips CPAP/BiPAP Lawsuits Update With tens of thousands of Philips CPAP and BiPAP machine lawsuits likely to be filed throughout the federal court system, each raising similar questions of fact and law, coordinated pretrial proceedings for the litigation have been established before U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti in the Western District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs allege that Philips CPAP foam caused cancer to develop, or that chronic exposure to the foam particles resulted in various lung injuries, including pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, sarcoidosis, and other conditions. According to the latest docket report (PDF) issued by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) on September 15, there are currently only 323 Philips CPAP claims filed before Judge Conti. However, the size and scope of the litigation is expected to rapidly increase over the remainder of 2022 and 2023, as thousands of additional claims have been registered on a tolling agreement. Earlier this month, Judge Conti held a Philips CPAP lawsuit “show and tell” science day, where the parties made presentations to the court that were intended to provide education about scientific issues that will come up during the pretrial proceedings. In the coming months, it is expected that Judge Conti will establish a “bellwether” process, where the parties will identify small groups of representative claims to prepare for early trial dates, which are designed to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the proceedings. However, if Philips CPAP machine settlements are not reached in the MDL, each claim may later be remanded to different U.S. District Courts nationwide for separate trial dates in the future. Tags: BiPAP Recall, Chemicals, CPAP Recall, Philips, Respiratory, Volatile Organic Compounds More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025) Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)