State-Owned Nursing Home Lawsuit Over Violation of Dementia Patient’s Rights Allowed: Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that state-owned care facilities can face nursing home neglect lawsuits, rejecting a controversial argument that such facilities should be immune from such litigation because they receive federal funding.

The decision stems from a lawsuit filed on behalf of Gorgi Talevski, whose family placed him in Valparaiso Care and Rehabilitation in Marion County, Indiana. He eventually died due to dementia, and what the family says was neglectful care at the facility.

The state-owned nursing home lawsuit was filed by his wife, Ivanka, against Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County, indicated the publicly funded nursing home used “chemical restraints” against Talveski, by improperly drugging him to control his dementia-based behaviors.

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of State-Run Nursing Home Neglect Lawsuits

At the trial court, Talevski’s case was dismissed by a federal district judge, who determined that only the federal government could enforce laws under the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FNHRA), which prohibits the use of chemical restraints.

However, the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that ruling in July 2021, after which the Health and Hospital Corp. filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, which heard arguments on the case in November.

In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court justices sided with the plaintiffs in an opinion (PDF) written by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, which indicates that the individual right to sue a nursing home is clear and assumed unless FNHRA specifies that only the government can enforce its statutes, which the law does not.

Only Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented with the ruling.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

Chemical Restraint Concerns

Chemical restraint involves the unnecessary use of antipsychotic medications on elderly patients and nursing home residents to sedate “unruly” patients. The practice has drawn the attention of drug regulators and safety experts, since the drugs often have no medical purpose and simply calm patients to make them easier for healthcare workers to care for them. It offers no benefit to the patient, but side effects of the antipsychotics may lead to serious complications.

Antipsychotic drugs like Abilify, Haloperidol, and Rexulti, are prescribed for contains like schizophrenia and other mental disorders. But in some cases, healthcare providers give these drugs, which decrease motor function, increase drowsiness and can increase dizziness, to elderly patients with dementia to calm them and make it easier to care for them.

Recently, the White House called on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to investigate the inappropriate practice of chemical restraint among nursing home residents. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has repeatedly warned nursing homes that off-label use of antipsychotics can lead to stroke, heart attack, diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, and falls, but yet the practice continues.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

In the six months since a Bard hernia mesh settlement agreement was reached, at least two dozen new lawsuits have been brought, as the implants continue to fail and require revision surgery.
As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025.
Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.