Mirena IUD Class Action Lawsuit Over Breast Cancer Risk Cleared to Move Forward
The federal judge overseeing the case indicated many of Bayer's arguments to dismiss the Mirena IUD class action lawsuit are science-based questions which should be held for later in the pretrial proceedings.
A federal judge has cleared the way for a class action lawsuit to proceed against Bayer, claiming that women face an increased risk of breast cancer when they are implanted with the Mirena IUD birth control implant.
The Mirena IUD is a small, t-shaped device that is placed into the uterus to provide long-term protection against pregnancy for up to five years. The polyethylene frame contains a steroid reservoir that releases levonorgestrel, which is a second generation progestin.
The Mirena breast cancer class action lawsuit was originally filed in March 2022 by Priya Sidhu. She seeks class action status for all women who received the implant, saying Bayer failed to warn them that the Mirena increased the risk of developing breast cancer.
Sidhu indicated she and other women would have never paid for the procedure and been implanted with the device had the manufacturer adequately warned patients and the medical community.
Did You Know?
Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers
A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.
Learn MoreThe lawsuit claimed Bayer knew about the increased breast cancer risks for years; since studies dating back to at least 2010. However, the risks only truly came to public notice in 2014, when Finnish researchers published a study in Obstetrics & Gynecology which found that women who receive the Mirena IUD to treat heavy periods may face a greater risk of breast cancer.
The researchers saw a nearly 20% increase in the risk of breast cancer with levonorgestrel IUDs.
Judge Refuses to Dismiss Mirena Breast Cancer Lawsuit
In March, Bayer filed a motion to dismiss Sidhu’s lawsuit on a number of different grounds. The Court heard oral arguments over the motion to dismiss in August.
In its motion, Bayer disputed whether five studies being used by plaintiffs truly show an increased risk of breast cancer linked to the Mirena IUD. The company also claimed plaintiffs lacked standing to file a claim because they had suffered no injuries, and that the class action should be limited to California residents only.
In addition, Bayer claims the lawsuit is preempted by federal law, saying the company could not have changed the label warnings for the Mirena IUD because it lacked scientific evidence to convince the FDA to do so.
In an order (PDF) issued on October 5, U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman rejected most of Bayer’s motion, saying most of the science-based arguments affecting the study, causation and federal preemption are inappropriate at this stage of the proceedings.
While Judge Freeman did dismiss some parts of the lawsuit, including a claim of unjust enrichment and violations of some California consumer laws, the bulk of the complaint was cleared to proceed. She also indicated that Sidhu would be allowed to pursue punitive damages against the company in her lawsuit.
The case’s class action status has not yet been certified.
Mirena is the best selling IUD in the United States. However, only a few variations of the long-term birth control implants are on the market, including Mirena and Skyla, as well as the ParaGard, which does not release levonorgestrel.
In prior years, Bayer has already faced thousands of Mirena IUD lawsuits over various problems with the implant, involving allegations that the drug maker failed to adequately warn about potential side effects of the IUD birth control. Most of the cases involve women who suffered severe internal injuries after Mirena IUD migrated out of place, resulting in perforations of the uterus and other complications.
15 Comments
ReginaOctober 18, 2024 at 12:53 pm
I had mirena for 8 years, changed it out 2 times and in 2015 I was diagnosed with invasive ER/PR positive stage 2b breast cancer. Had to have chemo, hysterectomy, breast reconstruction with 12 and counting surgies, another scheduled for Jan 2025. Financial, emotional and psychological trauma for me andcmy family has been tremendous.
KlaraOctober 16, 2024 at 8:57 pm
I had the Mirena placed in 2012 at 21 years old after suffering with stage 4 endometriosis and PCOS. I have had 3 Mirenas since 2012. I was diagnosed in 2021 with high grade 3 DCIS ER- PR+ HER2+++ I'm facing the same again this year with a new mass in 2024. I have no family history and the genetic testing I did cleared me of having the genes.
MonicaOctober 16, 2024 at 3:30 pm
I had mirena for 15 years, changed it out 3 times and in 2019 I was diagnosed with invasive ER/PR positive breast cancer. Had to have chemo, radiation, hysterectomy, breast reconstruction, and other procedures. Not to mention the emotional and psychological trauma this all brought my family and me.
IngridSeptember 21, 2024 at 2:55 pm
I had the mirena IUD for 5+ years In 2024 I was diagnosed with breast cancer.
AndreaApril 30, 2024 at 4:04 pm
I was recently diagnosed with stage 4 invasive ductal carcinoma. I had Mirena and none of this information was given to me.
DaisyApril 3, 2024 at 11:24 am
I have been diagnosed with breast cancer due to my birth control.. soo much pain
SandraMarch 30, 2024 at 12:23 pm
I have had the Mirena IUD placed 3 times in the past 16 years… just got it out in July 2023… Diagnosed with Breat Cancer stage 2/3 in January ‘24.
WeiFebruary 15, 2024 at 11:53 am
I had my Mirena since Feb 2023 and definitely found the change of my breast after insertion. Then in May 2023 I felt a bump in my left breast and invasive ductal cancer was confirmed in Sept 2023. And my Cancer is both ER and PR positive. I booked appointment to have Mirena removed in Oct 2023 and then experienced very heavy withdraw bleeding which brought me to ER.
MaryFebruary 7, 2024 at 2:25 am
Have had mirena for 15 years. Changed 3 times. I now have breast cancer. I am 43 years old that's got to have a double mastectomy and reconstructive surgery with chemo and radiation. I am devastated
TashebaJanuary 24, 2024 at 4:29 pm
I had the Mirena IUD put in me 2020 and it left me with huge Fibrous the Mirena went from my Uterus IUD Identified to the left of midline overlying the lumbosacral junction.
ReneDecember 19, 2023 at 9:55 am
Mirena was inserted in August 2022 and in November 2023 I was diagnosed with early stage invasive ductal cancer
DianaDecember 9, 2023 at 4:36 pm
I have used Mirena products for the last 7-8 years and have had increasing health concerns over product use (contemplating removal). Will current and former product users be contacted via mail/postcard regarding the class action settlement, if this proceeds to move forward?
TracyNovember 24, 2023 at 2:52 am
I had a Merena for 10 years until I was diagnosed with ER, PR positive breast cancer. I was told it would prevent endometrial cancer.
GinaNovember 14, 2023 at 6:38 pm
I use Marena for 15 years and ended up with Invasive Ductal carcinoma
JulieOctober 14, 2023 at 1:31 am
This is GREAT NEWS! I fell victim to the Mirena IUD and Bayer Pharmaceuticals' deceptive marketing to my OB-GYN Specialist in August of 2013, when it was recommended to treat my prolonged and heavy periods. By August of 2014 (basically 1 year's time frame) I was diagnosed with Invasive Breast Cancer. The Mirena IUD literally destroyed my entire life and nearly took it as well.