Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Medtronic Pacemaker Defects Reported Among Kappa and Sigma Devices May 21, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your Comments Approximately 37,000 Medtronic Kappa and Sigma pacemakers could contain a wiring defect, according to an advisory letter Medtronic sent to doctors this month. The defect could cause the pacemaker to fail and potentially result in serious injury or death. At least two fatalities have already been reported that may have been caused by the Medtronic pacemaker defects, which can result in the separation of the wiring between the circuit board and other components. This could cause a loss of rate response, battery depletion, loss of telemetry or no output. Patients who are experiencing problems with the faulty pacemakers may show signs of fanting or lightheadedness. Out of nearly 1.7 million Kappa and Sigma pacemakers implanted in patients since 1997, Medtronic estimates that less than 2% of the devices contain the wiring defect. The pacemakers were primarily manufactured between November 2000 and November 2002, and many are already approaching the normal elective replacement time. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Doctors were notified that approximately 15,200 patients implanted with Medtronic Kappa pacemakers and 6,100 patients with Medtronic Sigma pacemakers should be monitored for potential device failures. In addition, another 15,600 patients with Sigma devices that were included in a 2005 advisory involving wire separations caused by a cleaning solvent used during the manufacturing process, may also impacted by this wiring defect. Despite the potential pacemaker problems, Medtronic has not recommended that physicians consider device replacement unless a patient is pacemaker dependent. If the device is not already at the elective replacement time, Medtronic is offerinig a supplemental device warranty for those patients. For non-pacemaker dependent patients, physicians have been advised to continue routine follow up and to instruct patients to seek immediate medical attention if they experience symptoms like fainting or lightheadedness. Medtronic currently faces a number of lawsuits regarding an October 2007 Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead recall, which involved a faulty electrical wire that connects the defibrillator to the heart. The defective lead was removed from the market because it was found to be prone to fracturing or breaking, which could result in a massive electrical shock or cause the defibrillator to not work when it is needed. The Heart Rhythm Society has suggested that the FDA and device manufacturers should cease use of the word “recall” in association with implanted heart devices, instead calling the actions advisories or safety noticies. The advocacy group fears that many patients automatically assume that they must undergo surgery to have the defective device removed in its entirety if a recall is issued. However, in many cases, the small chance of a device failure is not great enough to warrant the risk of undergoing a replacement surgery. Tags: Defibrillator Lead, Kappa Pacemaker, Medtronic, Medtronic Recall, Pacemaker Recall, Sigma Pacemaker Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order April 1, 2025 Judge Rejects J&J’s Third Bankruptcy Filing, Killing $9B Talcum Powder Settlement April 1, 2025 Igloo Cooler Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fingertip Amputation Risks April 1, 2025 4 Comments Sheila July 14, 2009 I had my first Medronic duel pacemaker placed in 1992, after a total node ablation. Between 2000 – 2002 I received a Medronic Sigma replacement. No problems for a long time. However, recently I have been going into Atrial Fibulation causing palpations, chest pain, and shortness of breath. To-day, is the first time I have heard anything about a ‘recall, ‘ so I am wondering if the pacemaker could be causing my problem? It should be noted that over the seventeen years that I have had a medronic device, I have been delighted with the outcome and it has given me a quality of life more than I could ever have dreamed of before, I recieved my original implant. Cheers to Medronic. . . and I look forward to my next replacement to keep on pacing. . . Mark October 16, 2009 I wish I had the same story to report but unfortunately my sixteen year old son is not here to tell his story so I will. http://www.robertsfight.com Mark October 24, 2009 http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm165711.htm If I am not mistaken this series of pacemakers recalled has between a 3% and 4% failure rate 3.8 years after implantation. Diane October 28, 2009 My husband underwent non-cardiac surgery today, 10/27/2009 with a Medtronic Kappa DR 900 series pacemaker in place. It was detected immediately in surgery that there was a Lead fracture. We went through hours of not knowing what to expect and the conclusion of a cardiac physician to see if we needed to do something immediately. We were NOT notified of the recall in June of this year. We were lucky this time- what about those that were not so lucky???? Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025) Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)