MDL Petition filed for Shoulder Pump Lawsuits

Plaintiffs’ attorneys in federal product liability lawsuits involving the use of pain pumps following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, have filed a petition seeking to consolidated all cases for pre-trial litigation as part of a coordinated process known as an MDL, or multi-district litigation.

Various lawsuits have been filed in different federal courts throughout the United States alleging that the use of the intra-articular pumps to deliver pain medication after arthroscopic surgery caused the development of a rare, disabling shoulder condition known as Post-Arthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis (PAGCL). The condition is associated with the progressive destruction of cartilage, resulting in pain and often permanent disabilities.

The petition was filed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer, coordinate and consolidated all of the lawsuits for purposes of pretrial proceedings. An MDL, or multi-district litigation, is common in complex product liability cases where many people allege injuries as a result of the same medical device or medication. The procedure is designed to speed up the process of handling such cases by transferring them all to one court with a judge coordinating all of the pre-trial proceedings. If the cases do not settle or otherwise resolve, they will be remanded back to the originating court for trial.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

According to the petition, at least 13 shoulder pump lawsuits are pending in federal courts throughout the United States. However, hundreds of additional cases are currently being reviewed and investigated by attorneys who are preparing to file suits.

An article published in the July 2007 issue of the American Journal of Sports Medicine linked the use of intra-articular pain pumps after arthroscopic shoulder surgery to the development of PAGCL. Since that time lawyers have been reviewing potential shoulder pain pump lawsuits on behalf of individuals who developed symptoms of PAGCL, such as pain, stiffness, popping, grinding, decreased range of motion and loss of strength, after arthroscopic surgery.

In the lawsuits that have been filed, plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers encouraged the use of pain pumps following arthroscopic surgery as an alternative to other forms of pain management, even though they are not approved for that use by the FDA, and have not been adequately studied to determine they are safe for that purpose. In addition, the plaintiffs claim that the manufacturers and drug makers misled doctors about the dangers of developing Post-Arthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis (PAGCL).

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Novo Nordisk Fails To Warn About Risk of Gastroparesis from Wegovy, Lawsuit Alleges
Novo Nordisk Fails To Warn About Risk of Gastroparesis from Wegovy, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted today)

A Wegovy gastroparesis lawsuit filed by a Pennsylvania couple accuses the manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, of failing to provide adequate warnings about the true risks of the injectable weight loss drug.

Lawyers
Lawyers "Optimistic" Suboxone Tolling Agreement Will Be Reached For Tooth Decay Lawsuits (Posted today)

Plaintiffs and defendants involved in Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits say they are close to a deal that would allow the filing of federal complaints after some state statue of limitation laws would have disqualified plaintiffs from filing.

Lawsuit Indicates Tepezza Hearing Impairment Warnings Were Delayed By Horizon Therapeutics, Disregarding Safety of Users
Lawsuit Indicates Tepezza Hearing Impairment Warnings Were Delayed By Horizon Therapeutics, Disregarding Safety of Users (Posted yesterday)

New Jersey man indicates he has been left with permanent hearing impairment from Tepezza, alleging that Horizon Therapeutics failed to instruct doctors about the importance of conducting hearing tests on patients using the thyroid eye disease drug.