Facing Maui Wildfire Lawsuits, Hawaiian Electric Disputes Claims It Failed to Shut Down Power Lines

In response to a growing number of lawsuits over the devastating Maui wildfires, Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO), which provides power to the island, says its power lines were shut down and did not contribute to the deadly blaze.

The Maui wildfires began on August 8, resulting in widespread death and devastation. At least 115 people have been confirmed killed, with another 850 still missing in the town of Lāhainā on Maui Island.

Hawaiian Electric now indicates the first fires were reported in the morning of August 8, which were caused by wind knocking down its power lines, but the fire was reportedly spread due to high winds and dry grasses throughout the town of 13,000. It is the deadliest wildfire in the U.S. in at least 100 years.

Ultra-Processed-Foods-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Ultra-Processed-Foods-Lawsuit-Lawyer

In the wake of the fire, and as recovery operations continue, Hawaiian Electric faces a growing number of lawsuits brought by area residents, as well as the County of Maui itself, alleging that the company contributed to the wildfires by failing to shut off power lines, which added to the blaze when they fell and burned.

However, the company issued a press release on August 27, disputing plaintiffs’ claims.

According to the Hawaiian power company, the fires began on August 8, and were caused by downed power lines, but the initial fire was reportedly contained until a second blaze broke out that afternoon. By that time, Hawaiian Electric claims it had depowered the lines for at least six hours beforehand.

The cause of the second, so-called “Afternoon Fire” has not yet been determined, company officials say. However, Hawaiin ELectric indicates there was no power running to any of its lines anywhere on the West Maui coast.

“We were surprised and disappointed that the County of Maui rushed to court even before completing its own investigation,” HECO president and CEO Shelee Kimura said in the press release. “We believe the complaint is factually and legally irresponsible. It is inconsistent with the path that we believe we should pursue as a resilient community committed and accountable to each other as well as to Hawaii’s future.”

Kimura said the county’s lawsuit may leave the company no choice but to use the legal system to show the County’s own failures in handling and failing to prevent the wildfires.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has outlined the schedule for preparing a group of hair relaxer lawsuits for early bellwether trials, which will not go before a jury until at least 2027.
A BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit representing five women from across the country claims that the recalled implant was defectively designed, resulting in a recall and numerous complications.
Suboxone lawyers will meet today with a federal judge, to discuss the status of thousands of tooth decay lawsuits brought over the opioid treatment film strips.