Manufacturers Seeks Dismissal of Zantac Lawsuits in Delaware State Court

GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer and other drug makers face more than 70,000 Zantac cancer lawsuits in Delaware state court, after a U.S. District Judge dimissed all claims filed in the federal court system in 2022.

A Delaware judge is currently considering arguments over whether thousands of Zantac lawsuits will be allowed to move forward in state court, following a prior decision that resulted in the dismissal of all claims brought at the federal level.

Zantac (ranitidine) was used by millions of Americans for treatment of heartburn and acid reflux, before it was removed from the market in late 2019, following the discovery that the active pharmaceutical ingredient is inherently unstable and produces high levels of the chemical byproduct N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which is a potent human carcinogen.

Over the past four years, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Sanofi and various other manufacturers, distributors and retailers involved in the sale of brand name or generic ranitidine pills have faced Zantac lawsuits brought by former users who indicate they have been diagnosed with bladder cancer, esophageal cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer or other injuries, as NDMA moved through their body.

ZANTAC LAWSUITS

Did you or a loved one take recalled Zantac?

Side effects of Zantac may increase the risk of cancer, due to chemical impurities found in the heartburn drug.

Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

For several years, most of the litigation was focused in the federal court system, where all Zantac cancer lawsuits were centralized before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings. However, in 2022 Judge Rosenberg issued a controversial ruling, determining that all of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses were excluded from testifying at trial under federal evidentiary rules.

While appeals have been filed to challenge Judge Rosenberg’s ruling, the decision has left federal plaintiffs without any means of proving the recalled Zantac pills caused their cancer, and all Zantac lawsuits pending in the federal court system have been dismissed. However, the federal ruling did not have any impact on lawsuits filed in Delaware, California and various other state courts, where different standards for the admissibility of expert witness testimony apply.

Delaware Zantac Lawsuit Dismissal Hearings

Starting on Monday, Delaware Superior Court Judge Vivian Medinilla began hearing arguments from several manufacturers who want more than 70,000 Zantac lawsuits filed at the state level dismissed on similar grounds, indicating the claims are not supported by science.

The hearings are scheduled to last through today, and could determine whether the bulk of Zantac lawsuits filed in that state move forward. Much like the federal cases, if the manufacturers can convince Judge Medinilla to exclude all of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, it would effectively kill the litigation again.

The judge is expected to use the same legal standards that were used at the federal level, however, that does not mean she will reach a similar conclusion. In addition, these cases are using a different set of expert witnesses from those presented in the federal lawsuits.

In November, GlaxoSmithKline reached a Zantac settlement agreement that resolved the first lawsuit scheduled to go to trial in California state court, along with three other claims in California that were slated for bellwether trials.

Even though the results of the trials would have had no binding impact on other Zantac cancer lawsuits pending nationwide, the trials were going to be closely watched to see how the jury would have responded to evidence and testimony which could be repeated in tens of thousands of trials nationwide.

5 Comments

  • LindaMay 2, 2024 at 7:04 pm

    Us the plantiffs rights are first. GSK should have applied that thought to US. GSK plays with the value of my time. How long I had cancer once I ingested their POISON. GSK also plays with the Courts and manipulate them. I'll promise you this GSK. You will see me and you will see how you mutilated my body from breast cancer 🎀 I will put my breasts or what was in front of all your investors eyed. DO[Show More]Us the plantiffs rights are first. GSK should have applied that thought to US. GSK plays with the value of my time. How long I had cancer once I ingested their POISON. GSK also plays with the Courts and manipulate them. I'll promise you this GSK. You will see me and you will see how you mutilated my body from breast cancer 🎀 I will put my breasts or what was in front of all your investors eyed. DO YOU WANT THAT TO BE YOUR DAUGHTER?

  • WendiMarch 17, 2024 at 9:56 am

    I need my father's death not to be in vain this has nothing to do with the settlement it has all to do with my father's name and how zantac was involved in my father's death and it can't just be dismissed my father's death cannot just be dismissed

  • TamaraMarch 15, 2024 at 4:21 pm

    Hi...I was diagnosed with stage 3 Breast cancer in 2008...I had a Brac and hedertairy test done...Neither one came back positive that it was from my family...I took Zantac as well for acid reflux...I wish this judge really consider our hearts and find it in hers to punish these company's...this has changed my whole life...not once but twice for me....I'm still hanging on for hope and i really hope[Show More]Hi...I was diagnosed with stage 3 Breast cancer in 2008...I had a Brac and hedertairy test done...Neither one came back positive that it was from my family...I took Zantac as well for acid reflux...I wish this judge really consider our hearts and find it in hers to punish these company's...this has changed my whole life...not once but twice for me....I'm still hanging on for hope and i really hope she finds these companies liable for their actions

  • DannyFebruary 23, 2024 at 12:19 pm

    I feel large corporations that add poison to there products should be criminal

  • DennisJanuary 24, 2024 at 5:00 pm

    My wife had acid reflux problems back in the 80's and 90's, she lived on zantac, it was the most popular antacid then. In 1999 she was diagnosed with breast cancer and had one of her breasts removed. In November 2014 she was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and on February 25, 2015 she passed away. The Zantac contributed to both of her cancers and death.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Moving Forward Simultaneously in Federal MDL and Various State Courts
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Moving Forward Simultaneously in Federal MDL and Various State Courts (Posted yesterday)

Lawyers will meet today with the federal judge presiding over all hair relaxer lawsuits, as women diagnosed with uterine, endometrial and ovarian cancer continue to file claims throughout the U.S. court system.

SteriCare Sodium Chloride Lawsuit Claims Recalled Saline Solution Caused Infection, Wrongful Death
SteriCare Sodium Chloride Lawsuit Claims Recalled Saline Solution Caused Infection, Wrongful Death (Posted yesterday)

A California couple has filed a SteriCare recall lawsuit, indicating they were prescribed contaminated sodium chloride solution that they used on their son's legs, leading to his death.

Silicosis Lawsuit Filed Against Artificial Stone Manufacturers, Distributors
Silicosis Lawsuit Filed Against Artificial Stone Manufacturers, Distributors (Posted 2 days ago)

An artificial stone countertop fabricator and installer has filed a lawsuit after he developed a debilitating lung disease, known as silicosis, alleging that manufacturers failed to protect workers from inhaling dangerous amounts of silica dust.