Government Incentives Leading to Risky Atherectomy Procedures for Vascular Patients, ProPublica Reports

Just 90 doctors account for about $1 billion in government payments for risky, and often unnecessary, atherectomy procedures, the report found.

Recent changes to Medicare may be incentivizing doctors to perform unnecessary procedures to clear plaque from blocked arteries, according to a new ProPublica investigative report.

The report indicates since changes were made to Medicare’s payment structure in 2008, there have been massive increases in payments for atherectomies, which are procedures designed to open arteries blocked by plaque with lasers, blades and other less invasive methods than full surgery.

The changes led to office-based payments from Medicare for heart stents increasing from $1,700 to $6,400, balloon implants payments increasing from $3,800 to $4,800, and atherectomies reimbursements for office procedures were set at $13,500 per procedure; compared to $11,450 if the procedure was done in a hospital.

The independent journalism group ProPublica indicates that the number of atherectomies increased by 60% overall from 2011 to 2014.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Filed Over Unnecessary Heart Procedures

As a result of the increase in atherectomies, many of which were later determined to be unnecessary, a number of doctors nationwide have faced malpractice lawsuits in recent years, as well as disciplinary actions from state medical boards.

One Maryland doctor, Dr. Jeffery Dormu faces numerous lawsuits after performing more than 3,400 atherectomies in the last 10 years, earning millions of dollars. Last year, the Maryland Board of Physicians suspended his license, put Dormu on two years of probation and fined him $10,000 for performing unnecessary and invasive medical procedures.

One of Dormu’s patients had to have a leg amputated, and another patient bled to death after Dormu began operating on her, according to a wrongful death complaint filed in April 2022 by the woman’s daughter.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

However, many of the doctors who have been disciplined, like Dormu, were let off with extremely minor fines, especially in comparison with how much they made off performing the unneeded surgeries, putting their patients at risk of complications and adverse health events that could have been avoided.

According to the ProPublica report, after paying the fines, many doctors and healthcare professionals continued to practice, and potentially, perform more unnecessary procedures for lucrative amounts of taxpayer money.

ProPublica found that from 2017 to 2021, the top 5% of doctors performing atherectomies accounted for more than a third of the procedures nationwide. This means about 90 doctors brought in about $1 billion in government payments for the procedures.

Health experts called for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to conduct more oversight on these procedures by reducing reimbursments or investigating doctors who conduct an unusually high number of atherectomies.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Depo-Provera Lawsuit MDL Application Will Be Considered by JPML at Hearing on Jan. 30, 2025
Depo-Provera Lawsuit MDL Application Will Be Considered by JPML at Hearing on Jan. 30, 2025 (Posted 3 days ago)

With a growing number of women pursuing Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits throughout the federal court system, the U.S. JPML will decide whether to consolidate and centralize the claims before one judge for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.