Fracking Operations Not Telling Investors Full Story on Environmental Risks: Report

A new report warns that most oil and gas companies are failing to disclose to investors how their hydraulic fracturing operations may be impacting the environment. 

On December 11, the Investor Environmental Health Network (IEHN) and a number of other organizations released a fracking scorecard called “Disclosing The Facts” (DTF) 2014, which criticizes the energy industry for continuing to remain secretive about how the risks associated with their operations.

The report indicates that investors are getting too little information on the release toxic chemicals, which may affect water quality, waste management, air pollution and the surrounding communities.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

Fracking is a controversial process that involves the injection of a mixture of water, sand and fluids, which the gas industry has fought to keep secret, into the ground at extremely high pressure, cracking shale deposits and freeing trapped natural gas, so that it can then be removed. Those fluids are then sucked from the ground and often disposed of in wastewater wells.

The process has come under increasing scrutiny over the last several years, as it has become a popular method of gas extraction with the development of new drilling techniques and the discovery of large shale reserves.

Critics have linked fracking to a variety of pollutants, claim it puts groundwater sources at risk and say that increased truck traffic, air pollution and other problems can reduce property values and sicken nearby residents.

The report notes that three companies, BHP Billiton, Hess, and EQT have made significant improvements in the release of environmental impact information. However, the investigators found that most other companies showed little to no improvement over the last year.

“The results of the 2014 DTF show that many energy companies are still largely failing to rigorously disclose the impacts of their hydraulic fracturing operations on communities and the environment,” Richard Liroff, executive director of IEHN, said in a press release. “We are encouraged by a handful of companies that have clearly risen to our challenge with the DTF scorecard, but data on key metrics remain largely absent for most companies, making it difficult for investors and the public to assess and compare companies’ performance.”

The report was released in association with As You Sow, Boston Common Asset Management, and Green Century Capital Management.

“Our report found that companies across the industry are relying on sweeping statements and empty assurances that fracking is safe, while still failing to provide data to demonstrate improved practices,” Lucia Von Reusner, shareholder advocate for Green Century Capital Management, added. “Public controversy about fracking will continue unless companies can prove that they are actively working to reduce toxic chemical use, water consumption, methane leakage, and other negative impacts of fracking that damage the environment and local communities.”

The report looked at the public disclosures of 30 companies. It assessed them on five different areas of environmental, social, and governance-related risks, including toxic chemicals, water and waste management, air emissions, community impacts, and management accountability.

The report found that companies were the least transparent when it came to how they identify and address the impact their operations have on communities. They reported most on how they are switching to pipelines to transport water instead of using diesel trucks in order to lower air emissions.

Environmentalists, a number of lawmakers, local communities and consumer advocacy groups have expressed concerns for years that hydrofracking presents a threat to groundwater supplies and the environment.

Recently, a number of studies have shown that there may be a link between fracking and earthquakes, suggesting that the intense pressure from the unidentified fluids can cause ground tremors violent enough to damage property and cause injuries and possibly deaths.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.
An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe.
Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer.