Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Lawsuits Over Fosamax Bone Fractures Remanded Following Supreme Court Pre-Emption Ruling December 2, 2019 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Following a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has remanded hundreds of Fosamax bone fracture lawsuits for a U.S. District Judge to decide whether the failure to warn cases are pre-empted by federal law. Merck faces about 500 product liability lawsuits filed by users who suffered sudden femur fractures allegedly caused by side effects of Fosamax, typically occurring with little or no trauma. Plaintiffs have alleged the drug maker knew about the bone fracture risk with Fosamax, but withheld information from consumers and the medical community until the FDA required a label update in late 2010. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Merck has attempted to defend the litigation by arguing the failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law, maintaining that the FDA would not have allowed an earlier warning update, since the agency previously rejected a proposed label update about the risk of “stress fractures”. In 2014, the U.S. District Judge Joel Pisano granted the drug makers motion for summary judgment, dismissing all Fosamax fracture claims involving injuries that occurred before a label update in September 2010. After the Third Circuit vacated that order in March 2017, Merck appealed the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a ruling issued in May, the Supreme Court outlined the standard for a federal preemption defense in drug warning claims, indicating that it is a question for a judge, not a jury, to determine that there is “clear evidence” federal regulators were fully informed about the justifications for adding a warning, and the FDA, in turn, informed the drug maker the agency would not approve a label change to include that warning. While the Supreme Court justices remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with the opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas suggested in a concurring opinion that the Court should have rejected Merck’s preemption defense as a matter of law, indicating that Merck has been unable to point to any statute, regulation or other agency action that provides the force of federal law necessary to prohibit the drug maker from adding warning. Following reconsideration of the case in light of the Supreme Court ruling, the Third Circuit issued an order (PDF) on November 25, remanding the claims back to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, where a judge will decide whether there is evidence to support the drug makers argument that they should not be held liable for failure to warn about the bone fracture risk. “Following our review of the Supreme Court’s opinion and the supplemental briefing, we conclude and hereby order that these cases shall be remanded to the District Court in order to allow that court to determine in the first instance whether the plaintiffs’ state law claims are preempted by federal law under the standards described by the Supreme Court in its opinion,” the Third Circuit’s order states. “On remand, the District Court is instructed to determine the effect of the FDA’s Complete Response Letter and other communications with Merck on the issue of whether such agency actions are sufficient to give rise to preemption.” Judge Pisano, who previously presided over the consolidated pretrial proceedings in the Fosamax bone fracture litigation, retired in February 2015. The federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) has since been reassigned to U.S. District Judge Fedea L. Wolfson. Tags: Drug Side Effects, Femur Fracture, Fosamax, Merck, Supreme Court Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye April 25, 2025 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Roles in MDL April 25, 2025 Huffy Ride-On Vehicle Recalls Issued Due to Fire, Burn Injury Risks April 25, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (Posted: today) Following 52 years as a cosmetologist, a New Jersey woman says she developed bladder cancer due to routine exposure to hair color chemicals. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Dye Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Wrongful Death of Salon Professional (04/11/2025)Hairdresser Bladder Cancer Lawsuits Target L’Oréal, Henkel, Wella, Clairol and Other Popular Salon Dye Manufacturers (04/04/2025)Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (03/28/2025) Galaxy Gas Lawsuit Filed Over Nitrous Oxide Addiction and Brain Injury Risks (Posted: yesterday) A class action lawsuit has been filed against Galaxy Gas and several associated companies, alleging the product is marketed to teens using sweet flavors and deceptive safety claims, leading to widespread addiction and neurological injuries. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITGalaxy Gas Seeks Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Nitrous Oxide Death (04/21/2025)Nitrous Oxide Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fatal Side Effects of Flavored Gas Sold In Vape Shops (04/02/2025) 500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has randomly selected a group of 500 Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to go through case-specific discovery and further workup, which may eventually be eligible for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITStatus of Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits To Be Reviewed at MDL Conference (04/16/2025)Prenatal Opioid Exposure May Result in Smaller Brains Among Newborns: Study (04/14/2025)Suboxone Lawsuit Filing Deadline Nears for Many Tooth Decay Claims in 3-Year SOL States (04/07/2025)
Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (Posted: today) Following 52 years as a cosmetologist, a New Jersey woman says she developed bladder cancer due to routine exposure to hair color chemicals. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Dye Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Wrongful Death of Salon Professional (04/11/2025)Hairdresser Bladder Cancer Lawsuits Target L’Oréal, Henkel, Wella, Clairol and Other Popular Salon Dye Manufacturers (04/04/2025)Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (03/28/2025)
Galaxy Gas Lawsuit Filed Over Nitrous Oxide Addiction and Brain Injury Risks (Posted: yesterday) A class action lawsuit has been filed against Galaxy Gas and several associated companies, alleging the product is marketed to teens using sweet flavors and deceptive safety claims, leading to widespread addiction and neurological injuries. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITGalaxy Gas Seeks Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Nitrous Oxide Death (04/21/2025)Nitrous Oxide Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fatal Side Effects of Flavored Gas Sold In Vape Shops (04/02/2025)
500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has randomly selected a group of 500 Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to go through case-specific discovery and further workup, which may eventually be eligible for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITStatus of Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits To Be Reviewed at MDL Conference (04/16/2025)Prenatal Opioid Exposure May Result in Smaller Brains Among Newborns: Study (04/14/2025)Suboxone Lawsuit Filing Deadline Nears for Many Tooth Decay Claims in 3-Year SOL States (04/07/2025)