Food Safety Law Changes Would Give FDA New Authority

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill last week, which is endorsed by President Barack Obama, that could greatly increase the power of the FDA over the food industry if it is passed into law.

The bill represents the most expansive change in federal power over what we eat since the FDA was created 70 years ago, experts say. It would vastly increase food inspections, and allow the FDA to quickly issue food recalls, as opposed to waiting for businesses to do so voluntarily.

Most of the impetus would be placed on producers, who would have to meet new stringent monitoring and safety standards designed to detect and prevent outbreaks of food-borne illnesses, such as salmonella, E. coli and other bacteria.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The bill passed the House by a 283-142 vote, and must also be approved by the Senate, which will likely vote on the bill after the August recess. The food industry supports the bill and President Obama has promised to sign the legislation, calling it “a major step forward in modernizing our food safety system.”

The bill will require food companies to create detailed safety plans, and would levy a $500 annual fee on all major food producers and importers to fund increased inspections by the FDA. Producers’ plans would identify likely risks, create plans to control those risks, and monitor their products to make sure their plans are effective.

The FDA would step up inspections of food facilities from about once every ten years to once every three years, with annual inspections required for facilities considered high-risk. The FDA would set safety standards for farmers and manufacturers. The agency would have increased power to issue food recalls, would be able to quarantine food shipments in geographic areas to prevent the spread of contaminated products, and would have increased access to farm and manufacturers’ records.

The push for a revision to food safety laws came in the wake of several major food poisoning outbreaks in recent years, involving contaminated spinach, peanut butter, beef, and cookie dough, which have caused numerous illnesses and deaths. The failure of regulators or manufacturers to identify the potential health risks before products were shipped to consumers has rattled Americans’ faith in the safety of the food industry.

The bill still faces opposition from Republicans and the farm lobby, who claim that the bill is too burdensome on farmers and would show little improvement in food safety. Additionally, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that, even after the new fees levied against food producers and importers, FDA’s new responsibilities would have a net additional cost of $2.2 billion over five years.

1 Comments

  • JimAugust 3, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    For almost 30 years FDA has been part of the problem by promoting pathogen contaminated sewage sludge as a fertilizer on vegetable crops. Here is a link to the original 1981 EPA, USDA and FDA policy which allowed this mess. http://thewatchers.us/EPA/1981-policy-EPA-USDA-FDA.pdf New laws and more money is not going th help. Now we need to stop it. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/help-ban-sludge#si[Show More]For almost 30 years FDA has been part of the problem by promoting pathogen contaminated sewage sludge as a fertilizer on vegetable crops. Here is a link to the original 1981 EPA, USDA and FDA policy which allowed this mess. http://thewatchers.us/EPA/1981-policy-EPA-USDA-FDA.pdf New laws and more money is not going th help. Now we need to stop it. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/help-ban-sludge#signatures

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits
Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge has agreed to divide lawsuits over gastroparesis injuries linked to drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro into multiple phases, examining how the condition is diagnosed and whether plaintiffs' claims are preempted by federal laws.

Adult Woman Files Similac Lawsuit Over NEC Injuries Experienced as a Newborn
Adult Woman Files Similac Lawsuit Over NEC Injuries Experienced as a Newborn (Posted 3 days ago)

Lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories failed to provide families and the medical community with adequate warnings about the risks associated with it’s cow’s milk-based Similac formula, which a now adult woman indicates has left her with life-long NEC injuries.

Amended Lawsuit Over BioZorb Implant Side Effects Outlines Problems Caused By Tissue Marker Design Defects
Amended Lawsuit Over BioZorb Implant Side Effects Outlines Problems Caused By Tissue Marker Design Defects (Posted 4 days ago)

Six breast cancer patients have asked a federal judge for permission to amend a complaint filed in March 2024, which describes problems linked to the device and painful side effects experienced when the tissue marker migrated out of position or shattered inside their bodies.