Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
FDA Should Do More to Regulate Food Additives, Health Experts Warn Thousands of food additives have been introduced into U.S. foods in recent years, without any safety review by the FDA, according to a new report. August 14, 2024 Martha Garcia Add Your Comments Federal food regulators have failed to protect Americans from potentially dangerous food ingredients, according to new warnings issued by a group of public health experts warn, who are calling for the agency to exercise more power over the inclusion of additives in foods sold to U.S. consumers. According to a recent report published in the American Journal of Public Health by researchers at the NYU School of Global Public Health and led by Jennifer Pomeranz, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has failed to protect the public from unsafe food additives and ultra-processed food. They are calling on the agency and lawmakers to address what they see as a serious public health threat. Food Additive Health Concerns Food additives are becoming much more common in the U.S. food supply, despite growing evidence that they may increase the risk of diet-related disease, toxicity, cancer, and other health problems. Manufacturers use numerous different types of food additives. Some are used to preserve foods and increase their shelf life, others improve texture, and some make food more palatable. They can include controversial ingredients like brominated vegetable oil and red dye no. 3, both of which have been linked to potential adverse health effects. Research has also linked emulsifiers, a common ingredient in processed foods, to an increased risk of breast and prostate cancer. Emulsifiers are widely used in pizzas, fast food products, and other highly processed products to improve the texture of food and extend shelf life. The FDA does not regulate food additives. Instead, ingredients are added using a loophole rule known as “generally recognized as safe,” or GRAS, which allows the food industry to self-regulate and label ingredients as GRAS, without having the FDA evaluate their safety or review any data on the ingredient. The federal rule was meant to be used for common ingredients like salt and vinegar, but increasingly became used for new ingredients, like preservatives, emulsifiers, and dyes. A study published in 2015 concluded most food additives in the American food supply have not been properly reviewed by the FDA. Do You Know About… Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Food Additive Regulatory Concerns From 1990 to 2010, there were more than 1,000 ingredients labeled as GRAS by manufacturers without notifying the FDA of the addition of the ingredient, according to this latest report. Since 2010, there have likely been thousands more added to America’s food supply without proper safety review by regulators. Researchers determined that, because of the lack of oversight, there is no good estimate of how many additives have been placed in the nation’s food supply through the GRAS designation. Much of the FDA’s budget comes from fees paid by pharmaceutical companies to have drugs reviewed. Because resources are largely allocated to the drug program, food oversight is often overlooked. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates the premarket safety of ingredients regulated as food additives but allows the food industry to self-regulate and determine which substances to classify as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) based on undisclosed data and conclusions that the FDA never sees,” Pomeranz’s team concluded. “Furthermore, the FDA lacks a formal approach for reviewing food additives and GRAS substances already found in the food supply. Substances in the food supply thus include innocuous ingredients (e.g., black pepper), those that are harmful at high levels (e.g., salt), those that are of questionable safety (e.g., potassium bromate), and those that are unknown to the FDA and the public.” The researchers called on the agency to develop a more defined policy to regulate food additives to better protect public health. Recent Food Additive Regulations The agency and congress have made some moves to more stringently regulate food additives in recent years. For example, after years of advocacy and public pushback the FDA recently banned brominated vegetable oil. Prior research shows brominated vegetable oil is linked to neurological problems and may damage the liver. The ingredient was banned by the United Kingdom, European Union, and Japan decades ago. In March, congressional legislators called on the FDA to reassess seven chemicals often used in meat, dairy, and egg products. The chemicals include preservatives, colorants, emulsifiers, and disinfecting agents known to have serious health side effects and are banned in the European Union and other countries. Tags: Breast Cancer, Brominated Vegetable Oil, Cancer, Congress, Emulsifiers, Food Additives, Prostate Cancer More Lawsuit Stories Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 March 7, 2025 After Recalling Oxbryta, Pfizer Seeks Dismissal of Class Action Brought by Former Users March 7, 2025 Eaton Fire Lawsuit Filed Against SoCal Edison by Los Angeles County March 7, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024) Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024) BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 4 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)
After Recalling Oxbryta, Pfizer Seeks Dismissal of Class Action Brought by Former Users March 7, 2025
Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)
Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024)
BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 4 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)