Ethicon TVT-Secur Mesh Lawsuits Ends in $20 Jury Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

A state court jury in Philadelphia has returned a $20 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division, including punitive damages designed to punish the manufacturer over problems with the Ethicon TVT-Secur transvaginal mesh

The trial involved a lawsuit brought by Margaret Engleman, who received the mesh implant for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, but later developed severe and debilitating complications when the TVT-Secur mesh eroded through her internal flesh. Due to the design of the vaginal mesh, some of it had to be left in Engleman’s body, which has caused ongoing pain and urinary problems.

Late last week, the jury returned a verdict that included $2.5 million in compensatory damages, and an additional $17.5 million punitive damages awarded against the manufacturer for recklessly endangering Engleman and other women.

Learn More About

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Complications from transvaginal mesh may cause severe injuries.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Ethicon and other transvaginal mesh manufacturers have faced tens of thousands of similar claims brought by women throughout the United States, each involving allegations that the mesh used for repair of pelvic organ prolapse and female stress urinary incontinence migrated through the vagina, causing infections and other painful injuries. However, many of the manufacturers have reached vaginal mesh settlements to avoid potential jury verdicts.

This case is at least the third multi-million dollar verdict in an Ethicon vaginal mesh lawsuit trial held in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. In February 2016, a jury awarded a woman $13.5 million, including $10 million in punitive damages. That followed a December 2015 trial, which resulted in a $12.5 million award for the plaintiff, including $7 million in punitive damages.

Three additional Ethicon mesh trials are scheduled over the next two months, and the manufacturer has indicated that it intends to appeal last week’s verdict.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Novo Nordisk Fails To Warn About Risk of Gastroparesis from Wegovy, Lawsuit Alleges
Novo Nordisk Fails To Warn About Risk of Gastroparesis from Wegovy, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted 2 days ago)

A Wegovy gastroparesis lawsuit filed by a Pennsylvania couple accuses the manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, of failing to provide adequate warnings about the true risks of the injectable weight loss drug.

Lawyers
Lawyers "Optimistic" Suboxone Tolling Agreement Will Be Reached For Tooth Decay Lawsuits (Posted 3 days ago)

Plaintiffs and defendants involved in Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits say they are close to a deal that would allow the filing of federal complaints after some state statue of limitation laws would have disqualified plaintiffs from filing.

Lawsuit Indicates Tepezza Hearing Impairment Warnings Were Delayed By Horizon Therapeutics, Disregarding Safety of Users
Lawsuit Indicates Tepezza Hearing Impairment Warnings Were Delayed By Horizon Therapeutics, Disregarding Safety of Users (Posted 4 days ago)

New Jersey man indicates he has been left with permanent hearing impairment from Tepezza, alleging that Horizon Therapeutics failed to instruct doctors about the importance of conducting hearing tests on patients using the thyroid eye disease drug.