Driver Attitudes Toward Traffic Safety Could Impact Traffic Violations: Report

Study finds targeted interventions could significantly influence driver behaviors associated with traffic violations, which often cause car accidents.

New research suggests that cultural and societal differences among drivers play a critical role in behaviors that lead to traffic violations, which are responsible for the majority of fatal car accidents every year.

According to the World Health Organization, road traffic injuries have become the eighth-leading cause of death worldwide, with about 1.35 million people killed annually in motor vehicle crashes.

In a report posted earlier this month on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), researchers in Asia conducted an international survey to understand driver behaviors that could help reduce the increasing number of traffic fatalities each year. The findings suggest that there is a strong correlation between drivers’ attitudes and the likelihood of committing traffic violations, which cause many of the accidents.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

In the study, a team of researchers led by Keshuang Tang of Tongji University in China conducted an international survey between 2017 and 2018, of drivers in China, Egypt, Italy, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom. The survey consisted of five sections, including self-reported driving conditions, demographic information, perceptions of traffic situations, attitudes toward risky traffic behaviors and support for traffic safety policies.

The researchers identified two distinct groups, which included a High Risk Driving Group (HRDG) and a Low Risk Driving Group (LRDG). The high risk group included drivers more accepting of risky behaviors and less supportive of traffic safety policies, while the low risk group consisted of drivers who are less tolerant of risky behaviors and more supportive of safety measures.

For members of the high risk driving group, attitudes toward traffic safety policies significantly influenced behavior and were less affected by others’ attitudes. In contrast, the behavior of the low risk driving group was significantly influenced by social norms and the attitudes of others.

The report also found differences in attitudes and behaviors across countries, highlighting that cultural and societal norms play critical roles in shaping drivers’ attitudes. In some countries, higher tolerance and inadequate enforcement or public awareness of behaviors such as not wearing seatbelts or using cellphones while driving led to worse attitudes regarding traffic safety.

Overall, the study suggests that targeted interventions are necessary to change drivers’ attitudes and behaviors. Specifically, stricter enforcement of traffic laws may be more effective for high risk drivers, while fostering a supportive environment where safe driving is modeled and encouraged could help reduce traffic violations among the low risk driving group.

“These results underscore the critical link between attitudes and behaviors, suggesting that traffic violations are not just individual actions but also manifestations of broader, collective psychological and behavioral patterns,” Tang said. “This nuanced understanding highlights the importance of addressing both individual and group-level tendencies in efforts to improve traffic safety.”

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Indicates Recalled Tissue Marker Migrated After It Failed To Absorb, Resulting in Severe Pain and Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Indicates Recalled Tissue Marker Migrated After It Failed To Absorb, Resulting in Severe Pain and Surgical Removal (Posted today)

Days after the FDA announced a BioZorb recall, an Arkansas woman has filed a lawsuit, indicating that her BioZorb tissue marker migrated out of position, causing pain and disfigurement, instead of harmlessly absorbing into the body as advertised.

Judge Outlines Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Census Requirements
Judge Outlines Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Census Requirements (Posted yesterday)

To help the parties identify Suboxone lawsuits that can be used as representative samples in early bellwether trials, the federal judge presiding over the litigation has directed the parties to conduct a census of all tooth decay claims.