Depakote Lawsuit Filed For Children with Spina Bifida, Other Birth Defects

Abbott Laboratories is being sued by the families of 40 children and one mentally disabled adult who were born with birth defects, such as spina bifida and neural tube malformations, after their mothers took the epilepsy drug Depakote during the first trimester of pregnancy. 

The Depakote lawsuit was filed on May 3 in St. Clair County Circuit Court in Illinois by a group of plaintiffs from across the country.

The complaint alleges that Abbott Laboratories failed to fully research the potential side effects of the antiepileptic drug for pregnant women, and failed to adequately warn about the risk of spina bifida and other birth defects from Depakote.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Depakote was approved in the United States in 1978 for treatment of certain forms of epilepsy. However, Depakote pregnancy side effects have been linked to an increased risk of severe birth defects when taken during the first trimester, especially during the first 28 days when neural tube closure and other critical formations are taking place.

According to allegations raised in the complaint, Abbott knew about the potential risk of Depakote birth defects on or before the date it began marketing the drug in the United States, but failed to adequately warn women or the medical community about the true nature and extent of the risk.

As early as 1995, a study reported an incidence rate of neural tube defects from Depakote, such as spina bifida, that was ten times greater than with other anti-epileptic drugs. Other research has found that more than one out of every ten infants exposed to Depakote during the first few weeks of pregnancy may develop major congenital abnormalities, or birth defects.

Despite information about the potential side effects, the families allege that Abbott attempted to minimize the risk of Depakote birth defects and downplayed the danger on the product labeling. The drug maker has also allegedly worked to expand the drug’s use through “off-label” promotions for depression, bi-polar disorder and treatment of migrains, although other alternatives are available that do not carry the same risk of birth defects.

In 2006, the FDA added a “black box” warning about the potential risk of Depakote birth defects after a study found that 20% of pregnant mothers who gave birth while on Depakote had a child with malformations or a birth defect. Birth defects associated with Depakote include spina bifida, cleft palate, abnormal skull development, malformed limbs, holes in the heart and urinary tract problems.

In May 2010, researchers found that Depakote problems for infants could occur after using the drug as early as the first trimester, which means that by the time many women discover they are pregnant, it could be too late to get off the drug and avoid birth defects for their unborn child.

In recent months, a growing number of similar Depakote lawsuits have been filed against Abbott Laboratories by families of children born with spina bifida and other birth defects or malformations.

1 Comments

  • CristineJune 4, 2011 at 6:55 am

    My granddaughter Zoey was born with her right foot miniturized and boneless at the tip of her ankle. It is a very tiny sole and 5 acutely tiny toes. My daughter Meghan, who is 19, repeatedly questioned her medical drs,. about the safety of her seizure and bipolar medications, namely Prozac and Lamictal and was never told of the risks.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Information About Suboxone Dental Claims To Be Exchanged By Parties in MDL
Information About Suboxone Dental Claims To Be Exchanged By Parties in MDL (Posted today)

A federal judge has ordered parties involved in Suboxone dental decay lawsuits to submit proposals for exchanging information that will guide the selection of representative bellwether claims for early test trials.

Master Baby Food Lawsuit Filed in MDL Outlines How Toxic Metals Caused Autism, ADHD in Children
Master Baby Food Lawsuit Filed in MDL Outlines How Toxic Metals Caused Autism, ADHD in Children (Posted 3 days ago)

Plaintiffs have submitted a baby food lawsuit Master Complaint that is expected to streamline the filing of lawsuits alleging that toxic heavy metals in Beech-Nut, Gerber, Hain and Nurture products caused ADHD, autism and other developmental disorders.

Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury
Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury (Posted 3 days ago)

Another AGGA device lawsuit has been filed by a man who says he had to have the device surgically removed less than a year after having it implanted due to jaw problems and migraines.