High-Dose Folic Acid During Pregnancy May Increase Cancer Risk for Children, When Mother Also Takes Epilepsy Drugs
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
Abbott Ordered To Produce “Overdue” Docs in Depakote Lawsuits December 19, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Abbott Laboratories must turn over medical literature and documents related to the potential side effects of Depakote as soon as possible, a federal magistrate has ordered. On December 16, U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams, of the Southern District of Illinois, issued an order (PDF) that requires Abbott to produce Depakote birth defect information that is “long overdue.” He also ordered the company to release custodial files that are also late. The documents are required as part of the discovery process in two Depakote lawsuits filed by parents who claim their children were born with defects or malformations caused by exposure to the epilepsy drug while in the womb. The parents accuse Abbott of failing to adequately warn pregnant women or their doctors that the antiseizure medication carried a risk of causing birth defects if taken during pregnancy. Learn More About Depakote Lawsuits Side effects of Depakote use during pregnancy may cause birth defects, delays. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Depakote Lawsuits Side effects of Depakote use during pregnancy may cause birth defects, delays. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The order notes that Abbott was asked to produce the documents months ago, but has apparently failed to meet the order’s requirements. The company says there is no centralized database to pull all the information from and that it will begin going through about 215 boxes of medical literature in a warehouse this week. “The Court notes that the documents are long overdue, as this issue was originally discussed with the Court, and the documents ordered produced, back in April. However, the Court will not impose another deadline for the production of these documents as several deadlines have not been met by Abbott and the Court will not set another arbitrary deadline,” the order reads. “Instead, the court ORDERS Abbott to turn over the documents as soon as possible and to exercise all avenues available to them to make this production as quickly as possible.” The Magistrate notes that it appears that Abbott is now taking the order seriously given recent moves the company has made, but warns that they could face other relief judgments if they continue to fail to produce the documents necessary to move the case forward. The parties will discuss the matter further in a telephone conference scheduled for Friday. Depakote Birth Defect Lawsuits Abbott currently faces a number of similar Depakote birth defect lawsuits filed by families throughout the country, which allege that the drug maker failed to adequately research the medication or warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with using the popular medication during pregnancy. Depakote (valproic acid) was approved in the United States in 1978 for treatment of certain forms of epilepsy. However, Depakote pregnancy risks have been associated with the development of severe birth defects and malformations, including spina bifida, cleft palate, abnormal skull development, malformed limbs, holes in the heart and urinary tract problems; especially when the drug is taken during the first 28 days, when neural tube closure and other critical formations are taking place. In 2006, the FDA added a “black box” warning about the potential risk of Depakote birth defects after a study found that 20% of pregnant mothers who gave birth while on Depakote had a child with malformations or a birth defect. Earlier this year, the FDA put new restrictions on Depakote pregnancy use, contraindicating it for pregnant women, but only when it was used for the treatment of migraines. The agency did not contraindicate it for pregnant women. The FDA changed all valproate-based drugs from a class “D” to a class “X” pregnancy drug, but only as they pertain to migraines. In addition to Depakote and Depacon, other drugs that are affected by the warning include Depakene, Stavzor and generic equivalents. A Class D classification means that a drug’s benefits may be acceptable despite known potential risks to pregnant women. A Class X designation means that the risks of a drug outweigh the benefits for pregnant women. However, the FDA still considers the side effects to be an acceptable risk for the treatment of epilepsy and manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder, but not migraines. Tags: Abbott, Birth Defects, Depakote, Depakote Birth Defect, Epilepsy, Epilepsy Drug, Spina Bifida More Depakote Lawsuit Stories Both Epilepsy and Anti-Seizure Drugs Increase Osteoporosis Risk, Study Warns June 15, 2023 Depakote Use During Pregnancy Linked to Psychiatric Problems in Childhood, Study Warns April 20, 2023 High-Dose Folic Acid During Pregnancy May Increase Cancer Risk for Children, When Mother Also Takes Epilepsy Drugs October 4, 2022 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 3 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024) Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024) BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 5 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)
Depakote Use During Pregnancy Linked to Psychiatric Problems in Childhood, Study Warns April 20, 2023
High-Dose Folic Acid During Pregnancy May Increase Cancer Risk for Children, When Mother Also Takes Epilepsy Drugs October 4, 2022
Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 3 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)
Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024)
BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 5 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)