Chantix Recall Lawsuits Over Cancer Risk Consolidated in Southern District of New York

The Chantix lawsuits all involve similar claims stemming from the discovery of cancer-causing nitrosamine-based impurities in 2021.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established centralized pretrial proceedings last month for all federal lawsuits over Chantix recalls, involving allegations that the stop-smoking drug was distributed with cancer-causing chemicals. Given common questions of fact and law, Chantix lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide will be transferred to the Southern District of New York, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings before one judge.

Chantix (varenicline) was introduced by Pfizer in 2006, as a prescription medication designed to help people quit smoking. However, problems with Chantix began to surface last year, when it was discovered that pills may contain dangerous levels of nitrosamines, which are believed to be a byproduct of the drug manufacturing process and may expose users to a risk of cancer.

Between June and September 2021, Pfizer announced a series of Chantix recalls, starting with limited batches of the medication sold, and later expanding the recall to include all lots of Chantix 0.5 mg and 1 mg tablets, all due to the same problems with high levels of the cancer-causing chemicals being detected in pills.

As a result of the recalls, multiple Chantix lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer, seeking class action status to pursue damages for consumers who paid for the expensive smoking cessation drug, which was adulterated and unfit for its intended purpose.

Chantix Recall Cancer Lawsuits Centralized in New MDL

In August, the County of Monmouth, New Jersey filed a motion seeking to consolidate all Chantix lawsuits in an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, indicating that all claims being pursued against Pfizer, Inc. throughout the federal court system should be centralized in the District of New Jersey, to reduce duplicative discovery into common issues and avoid conflicting pretrial rulings.

Pfizer indicated that it opposed centralization on September 22, arguing that there were too few cases to justify centralization proceedings in a Chantix MDL. However, the drug maker did ask that if the panel did determine consolidation was appropriate, the litigation should be managed out of the Southern District of New York.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Following oral arguments held last month, the JPML issued a transfer order (PDF) on December 22, agreeing with plaintiffs that the cases should be consolidated, but choosing to place them in the Southern District of New York, as Pfizer suggested, under U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla for coordinated and pretrial proceedings.

“On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization in the Southern District of New York will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation,” the panel wrote. “These putative class actions present common factual questions arising out of allegations that Pfizer voluntarily recalled the smoking cessation drug Chantix in 2021 after discovering that the product contained a nitrosamine impurity known as N-nitroso-varenicline, a probable human carcinogen.”

In complex product liability litigation, where a large number of claims are filed throughout the federal court system by individuals who suffered similar injuries as a result of the same or similar products, it is common for the federal court system to centralize the litigation for pretrial proceedings.

The order to consolidate the Chantix lawsuits comes after the JPML has formed several other coordinated proceedings for Zantac lawsuits and valsartan lawsuits filed over the same chemical impurities that contaminated the popular heartburn and blood pressure drugs.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Caused Dental Damage, Erosion and Tooth Decay
Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Caused Dental Damage, Erosion and Tooth Decay (Posted yesterday)

Kentucky man has filed a lawsuit against Suboxone manufacturers, indicating the opioid treatment film strips were known for years to cause the kind of permanent tooth damage he suffered, long before warning labels were added by the drug manufacturer.

Master Complaint Outlines Allegations in Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro Lawsuits in MDL
Master Complaint Outlines Allegations in Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro Lawsuits in MDL (Posted 4 days ago)

Plaintiffs pursuing GLP-1 injury lawsuits have filed a Master Complaint outlining common allegations being pursued against Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly over their diabetes and weight loss drugs, including Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and others.

Six Years of Depo-Provera Injections Caused Woman To Develop Intracranial Meningioma: Lawsuit
Six Years of Depo-Provera Injections Caused Woman To Develop Intracranial Meningioma: Lawsuit (Posted 5 days ago)

California woman indicates she was unaware there was a link between her meningioma and Depo-Provera injections until a study was published in March 2024, resulting in widespread publicity about the brain tumor risks.