Ceramic Hip Implant Lawsuit Alleges Doctor Influenced by Payments from Manufacturer

In a medical malpractice lawsuit that will go to trial in Pennsylvania next month, a 31-year-old woman alleges that her orthopedic surgeon’s recommendation that she participate in clinical trials for a new type of artificial hip was influenced by substantial consulting fees paid by the manufacturer of the device she received.

Katrina McKenzie, the 31-year-old woman, experienced acute hip pain after the birth of her first child. Dr. Jonathan Garino, her surgeon at the University of Pennsylvania, recommended replacement of both hip joints with a new type of implant made by Smith & Nephew. After surgery, McKenzie began to experience persistent pain, had trouble walking, and the artificial hip started squeaking when she moved. Consultation with another doctor revealed that the new ceramic-on-ceramic hip implant had worn out.

McKenzie filed a malpractice suit against Dr. Garino and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, claiming that the high consulting fees received by the doctor from the artificial hip maker had improperly influenced his recommendation that she receive the new type of ceramic hip implant. Dr. Garino failed to disclose that he was earning between $20,000 to $50,000 a year at the time, as a Smith & Nephew consultant.

Do You Know About...

Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry

Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods.

Learn More

Payments to doctors by medical implant manufacturers have generated a lot of concern over the past year among consumer groups and congress. Leading orthopedic surgeons are known to receive hefty consulting fees and royalties from artificial knee and hip makers, and recently safety issues which have begun to surface surrounding the use of new ceramic-on-ceramic hip implants has increased the controversy surrounding these payments.

A study in the Journal of Arthroplasty revealed that about 7% of individuals who received ceramic implants from 2003 to 2005 developed squeaking in their hips, compared with no reports of squeaking hips among the control group who received metal and plastic hip parts.

One of the more popular types of these new implants is the Styker Trident Ceramic Hip Replacement system. A number of lawsuits have been filed due to problems with Stryker Trident hip replacements, including reports of loosening and squeaking in the hip joint. These problems can have a severe impact on quality of life, reducing ability to participate in activities and often leading to additional surgeries.

While the new ceramic hip implants were promoted as being more durable than conventional models of plastic and steel, many patients like Katrina McKenzie are discovering that they may have been misled.

2 Comments

  • OpinionatedGiftOctober 8, 2010 at 6:01 am

    I've bad a hip replacement for 4 years now. A Stryker. It's been fantastic.

  • teenaSeptember 29, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    PLEASE DON'T DO IT!!!

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women
Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (Posted 4 days ago)

Women across the U.S. are now pursuing product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims to secure compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects linked to the use of Depo-Provera.