Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
Breast Tissue Expanders Used Near Internal Defibrillators May Cause Magnetic Interference: FDA March 9, 2016 Martha Garcia Add Your Comments Federal regulators indicate that patients with breast tissue expanders may face a risk of problems with pacemakers and defibrillators, which may fail due to magnetic interference. The FDA issued a warning to healthcare providers on March 8, including breast surgeons, cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiologists and plastic surgeons. The ageny indicates that there is the potential for interference between breast tissue expanders with magnetic ports and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) or pacemakers. The metal ports used in many breast tissue expanders have the potential to cause ICDs and pacemakers to malfunction, potentially causing serious injury to patients. Do You Know About… Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… Childhood Diabetes Lawsuits Against Junk Food Industry Lawyers are now pursuing financial compensation for families of children diagnosed with Type II diabetes, fatty liver disease and other chronic illnesses caused by addictive and harmful substances in ultra-processed foods. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION In some cases, patients with both the breast expander and a cardiac device may have a magnetic port that can come close enough to the cardiac device to cause magnetic interference. If magnetic interference is caused, the device will enter “magnet mode”. In this instance, an ICD will not deliver life-saving shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing therapy, which may be life threatening to the patient if dangerous abnormal heart rhythms were to occur. The warning comes after reports of magnetic interference between breast tissue expanders with magnetic injection ports and either ICDs or pacemakers in patients. The FDA then analyzed peer-reviewed literature, device labeling, adverse event medical device reports, and information from ICD manufacturers, health care organizations, and professional societies. The FDA is calling this a ‘small population risk,” since it is uncommon for patients with ICD or pacemakers to have also have breast reconstruction. However, for this who may be impacted, it is a potentially serious risk. ICDs are an implantable device used to correct-life threatening heart rhythm abnormalities in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death, or death from heart attack. Pacemakers are small devices placed in the chest or abdomen to help regulate abnormal heart rhythms. Breast tissue expanders are temporarily used to prepare patients for reconstructive breast surgery after mastectomy and also used to treat under-developed breasts or other soft-tissue deformities. Expanders are used for no more than 6 months to prepare the patient for surgery. Some expanders have a magnetic injection port used to guide the surgeon when injecting saline fluid to expand the breast. Inconsistent Device Warnings Patients who experience interference problems may hear an electronic tone indicating that the cardiac device has entered magnet mode, but this does not occur in every instance. When the device enters magnet mode, the device continuously paces without sensing the patient’s own heart rhythm. This can result in irregular heartbeats or more serious injury to the patient. The FDA indicated that the likelihood of either serious event occurring varies depending on the type of cardiac implant and proximity of the expander to the device. Both cardiac devices have labeling warning of potential magnetic interference and the breast expanders label warns of patients who already have implanted devices. In some cases, the ICD can be reprogrammed if a patient has a breast tissue expander in place, to help reduce interference. An alternative expander can be used in patients with implanted cardiac devices, including breast tissue expanders with a non-magnetic port, a non-magnetic metal disc or remote port. The FDA recommends healthcare providers avoid implanting a magnetic-port breast tissue expander when possible in patients with cardiac devices and reviewing all device labels for any implantable devices, including reviewing available treatment options before deciding on a course of action. If a patient with an implanted magnetic breast tissue expander requires the placement of an ICD or pacemaker, the FDA advises careful consideration of the choice of cardiac device, location and timing should be reviewed with the patient. Another possibility to help prevent interference would be to conduct more frequent cardiac device checks. Tags: ICD, Pacemaker More Lawsuit Stories Suboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage March 11, 2025 Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals March 11, 2025 3M Seeks Dismissal of More Than 100 Bair Hugger Infection Lawsuits March 11, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage (Posted: today) Suboxone lawyers will meet today with a federal judge, to discuss the status of thousands of tooth decay lawsuits brought over the opioid treatment film strips. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITMedical Records of Suboxone Tooth Decay Must Be Produced Under MDL Court Order (02/20/2025)Lawyers in Suboxone Dental Lawsuits Fail To Reach Agreement on Bellwether Selection Process (02/06/2025)Another Influx of Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits Expected in Coming Months (01/20/2025) 75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (Posted: yesterday) The MDL Judge will hear presentations from Depo-Provera lawyers seeking leadership positions during a two day hearing on March 13th and 14th, as a growing number of women continue to file brain tumor lawsuits against the makers of the popular birth control shot. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)Depo-Provera Injury Lawyers To Apply for Leadership Positions in MDL (03/03/2025)Judge Selects Five Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits for “Pilot” Trials Weeks After MDL Established (02/25/2025) Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 4 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)
Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals March 11, 2025
Suboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage (Posted: today) Suboxone lawyers will meet today with a federal judge, to discuss the status of thousands of tooth decay lawsuits brought over the opioid treatment film strips. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITMedical Records of Suboxone Tooth Decay Must Be Produced Under MDL Court Order (02/20/2025)Lawyers in Suboxone Dental Lawsuits Fail To Reach Agreement on Bellwether Selection Process (02/06/2025)Another Influx of Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits Expected in Coming Months (01/20/2025)
75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (Posted: yesterday) The MDL Judge will hear presentations from Depo-Provera lawyers seeking leadership positions during a two day hearing on March 13th and 14th, as a growing number of women continue to file brain tumor lawsuits against the makers of the popular birth control shot. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)Depo-Provera Injury Lawyers To Apply for Leadership Positions in MDL (03/03/2025)Judge Selects Five Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits for “Pilot” Trials Weeks After MDL Established (02/25/2025)
Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 4 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)