Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
Baltimore City Files Water Contamination Lawsuit Against Manufacturers of Toxic PFAS Chemicals Manufacturers should have known the chemicals in firefighting foam would lead to water contamination from toxic PFAS chemicals, according to the complaint November 8, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Following a recent investigation that found high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from toxic firefighter foam in Baltimore drinking water, the City has filed a lawsuit against 3M and other chemical manufacturers responsible for the contamination. The Maryland Department of Public Works issued a water quality report last summer, which warned that the Baltimore drinking water supply, which serves more than 1.8 million area residents and businesses in the City and County, contained high enough levels of PFAS to raise concerns about public health, according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. PFAS are a group of over 9,000 man-made chemicals which have been frequently used in consumer and industrial products to resist grease, oil, and water since the 1940’s. While they are found in a number of consumer products, the chemicals have caused widespread water contamination problems from firefighting foam, which has been widely used for decades on military bases, airports and other training locations to combat fuel-based fires. As a result of the harmful effects of the chemicals, many of the same manufacturers face hundreds of firefighting foam cancer lawsuits brought by former users, alleging that they were not adequately warned about the health risks. In addition, a number of communities and local water suppliers have also filed lawsuits over the costs associated with cleaning up the chemicals from drinking water. The same manufacturers also face an increasing number of PFAS water contamination lawsuits brought by individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, bladder cancer, testicular cancer, kidney cancer or ulcerative colitis, following years of drinking tap water that has been found to contain high levels of the chemicals from firefighter foam, particularly near military bases and other locations where PFAS was released into the water system. Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals? Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals? Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Baltimore became one of those communities on November 1, when the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore filed a complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court of Maryland, seeking to hold a number of chemical companies and safety equipment manufacturers liable for the contamination of the city’s drinking water. Defendants named in the lawsuit include 3M Company, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Corteva, Inc., Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, Raytheon Technologies, BASF Corp. and several others. “Defendants designed, manufactured, marketed, promoted, distributed, supplied, and/or sold PFAS-based aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) products, and certain chemical ingredients incorporated into those products, that were used and released in and near Baltimore and which now contribute to a serious environmental and public health crisis,” the lawsuit states. “Defendants knew that these dangerous chemicals would be released into the environment during the ordinary and intended use of their AFFF products, causing harm to the City, its residents, and those within the service area of the City’s municipal water systems, among others.” The lawsuit claims the defendants failed to instruct users of AFFFs of the need to take proper precautions to limit exposure and failed to provide adequate instructions about the potential risks. The city also accuses the manufacturers of not using less toxic compounds to make firefighting foam they knew would enter water supplies and impact the environment. Baltimore is seeking compensatory, consequential and punitive damages to pay for past, current and future costs of the presence of PFAS in drinking water supplies, stormwater and wastewater systems, and for damage done to properties and resources under the city’s management. PFAS Health Concerns from Firefighting Foam PFAS were first introduced into the manufacturing industry in the 1940’s, because of their ability to resist heat, grease, stains, and water. However, since then the chemicals have been linked to a myriad of adverse health effects including liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, high cholesterol, obesity, hormone suppression, and cancer. It is projected to take thousands of years for PFAS chemicals to degrade, and past studies have shown their ability to enter and stay in the environment and human body through the air, dust, food, soil, and water. Previous U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studies have shown PFAS chemicals primarily settle into the blood, kidney and liver, and could likely be detected in the blood of 98% of the U.S. population. The chemical substances are used to manufacture a number of products, including some food packaging materials, pizza boxes, popcorn bags, fabrics, nonstick cooking pans, and other products. However, it is perhaps most known for its use in firefighting foams used by military and civilian firefighters. November 2022 Firefighting Foam Water Contamination Lawsuit Update Given common questions of fact and law presented in the claims, all water contamination lawsuits over PFAS chemicals in AFFF are currently centralized before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in the District of South Carolina, for coordinated discovery, pretrial proceedings and a series of early bellwether trials, which are expected to begin next year. Early in the pretrial proceedings, Judge Gergel has established a “bellwether” program that started with a group of water contamination cases going through case-specific discovery in preparation for a series of early trial dates, that are expected to begin in mid-2023. If parties do not reach an AFFF lawsuit settlement agreement once the pretrial proceedings and bellwether test trials are completed, or the litigation is otherwise resolved, the cases will be remanded back to their originating federal court districts for trial. Tags: Cancer, Chemicals, Drinking Water, Firefighter Foam, Maryland, PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, Water Contamination Find Out If You Qualify for A AFFF Lawsuit Settlement More Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Stories Link Between AFFF and Liver Cancer, Thyroid Cancer To Be Examined by MDL Court February 17, 2025 PFAS Risks From Firefighting Foam Were Known by 3M for Decades: Guardian Report January 20, 2025 PFAS in Drinking Water Linked to Certain Forms of Cancer: Study January 16, 2025 1 Comments Derek November 11, 2022 My Parkinson disease symptoms started at the age of 47. The fingers on my left hand were stiff and were difficult to move. People noticed that my walk was not normal. I was often asked if I was hurt. I noticed nothing different about my walk. It was difficult getting up from a chair and getting out of a car. I was diagnosed a year later ,it was the onset of tremors starting in my right hand that caused my other symptoms to be recognized as Parkinson’s.. I am now 59. With the new herbal medicine for Parkinson I purchased from Multivitamincare . org was my only way to get rid of my PD,the herbal formula effectively reversed my condition and alleviated all my symptoms, people are suffering from this Parkinson disease due to lack of information. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024) Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024) BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 4 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)
Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A West Virginia woman’s lawsuit over complications with a Cartiva implant has been scheduled to go before a jury in February 2026, involving claims that the big toe implant failed just weeks before the manufacturer issued a Cartiva recall. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms Reported By Big Toe Surgery Patients in Lawsuits, Social Media and FDA Adverse Events (12/26/2024)
Lawsuits Over Social Media Addiction Injuries Cleared To Move Forward in MDL (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has rejected a motion to dismiss claims involving wrongful death and negligence raised in lawsuits over social media addiction brought by families throughout the U.S. MORE ABOUT: SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION LAWSUITGambling Addiction Lawsuit Filed Against Sports Betting Platform DraftKings (02/20/2025)Facebook, TikTok Named in Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Brought by Native American Tribe Over Harm to Youth (01/13/2025)Online Gaming Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Roblox, Epic Games Intentionally Targeted Minors (12/20/2024)
BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (Posted: 4 days ago) A group of eight lawyers have been recommended to serve in various leadership positions in the Biozorb litigation, taking actions that benefit all plaintiffs pursuing cases over injuries caused by the recalled breast tissue marker. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITSchedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)Joint BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Claims Implant Caused Seroma, Infections and Other Complications (02/04/2025)