Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Archdiocese of Baltimore Clergy Abuse Claims Must Be Filed By May 31 Under Bankruptcy Court OrderThe ruling gives plaintiffs a total of 245 days to file sex abuse claims against the Archdiocese of Baltimore since its late-September bankruptcy filing. December 19, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA federal judge is giving survivors of Maryland clergy abuse until May 31 to submit any claims against the Archdiocese of Baltimore, which has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a new law in the state, which removed the statute of limitations for filing lawsuits against the Catholic Church and other organizations that enabled the sexual abuse of children.The Archdiocese of Baltimore filed for bankruptcy at the end of September, following passage of the Maryland Child Victims Act of 2023 in April, which went into effect at the beginning of October. The law removes all statute of limitations restrictions on civil claims involving sexual abuse of children in the state, and the Catholic church was expected to weather the brunt of the expected litigation.In a letter to church members written at the time, Archbishop William E. Lori directly linked the churchโs bankruptcy filing to the anticipated cost of defending itself against what is expected to be a flood of lawsuits.Sexual Assault LawsuitsWere you a victim of sexual assault?If you or a loved were a victims of sexual assault, new laws removing the statute of limitations may allow you to pursue compensation.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONSexual Assault LawsuitsWere you a victim of sexual assault?If you or a loved were a victims of sexual assault, new laws removing the statute of limitations may allow you to pursue compensation.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe Maryland state legislature passed the Child Victims Act just days after a long-awaitedย Baltimore Archdiocese child sex abuse reportย was released by the Maryland Attorney General, which detailedย information about Catholic priests that abused children in Marylandย over the last 60 years, including the names of 146 priests, deacons, seminarians and others who have been credibly accused by more than 300 victims and witnesses that came forward during the investigation.In November, the Maryland Catholic Church and other organizations now facing Maryland child sex abuse lawsuits took steps to challenge the constitutionality of the new law, but that process could take months or even years. If the law is upheld, the Baltimore Archdiocese faced the prospect of thousands of lawsuits that may be filed for years, over prior decisions to protect priests who were known predators, and allow them to have continued access to vulnerable young children.Judge Sets Deadline for Sex Abuse Claim Filings Against ArchdioceseAt a hearing held on Monday, Judge Michelle Harner, of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland, set a claims bar date of May 31, 2024, which serves as a deadline for any survivors to file claims with the bankruptcy court against the assets of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.The deadline is several months longer than requested by the Church, which sought to require all claims to be presented by February 26. This would have given plaintiffs only about 150 days after the churchโs bankruptcy filing. The new date, agreed to by both sides, gives them 245 days to file in total.The Baltimore Archdiocese bankruptcy filing indicates the organizationโs assets are valued between $100 million and $500 million. However, the church estimates it faces between $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities.Judge Harner is expected to issue a formal ruling in the days ahead. She is also expected to approve a finalized claim form and the process for joining the litigation.Maryland Child Victims Act of 2023For years, lawmakers attempted toย change the Maryland child sex abuse statute of limitations, which previously prevented most survivors from pursuing lawsuits.Supporters of the legislation argued that removing the Maryland statute of limitations on child sex abuse claims was necessary, since many survivors are not prepared to address the conduct until much later in life. In addition, the Catholic Church has been notorious for covering up credible allegations, discrediting child survivors of abuse and pressuring devoted families from pursuing any action against priests or other members of the clergy.After a two year window in theย New York child sex abuse statute of limitationsย was opened in 2020, tens of thousands of claims were brought against the Boy Scouts, Catholic Church and other entitles throughout the state. The Buffalo Diocese alone had at least 230ย Catholic priests accused of sexually abusing minors, with eight specific priests accounting for more than 1,000 lawsuits filed in that part of the state.While statute of limitations laws have also been enacted in a number of other states, including New Jersey, California and Louisiana, other states are still debating similar bills that would allow survivors to hold abusers and entities that enabled their conduct accountable. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bankruptcy, Catholic Church, Child Abuse, Children, Maryland, Sexual Abuse, Sexual Assault, Statute of LimitationsMore Sexual Assault Lawsuit Stories Rhode Island Catholic Church Covered Up Sexual Abuse of Children For Decades: Report March 9, 2026 Apartment Complexes Face Sex Trafficking Lawsuit After Minor Was Abused at Multiple Locations January 8, 2026 New York Archdiocese Seeks Global Settlement of Child Sex Abuse Lawsuits December 12, 2025 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026) Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: yesterday)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026) SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: 2 days ago)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)
Apartment Complexes Face Sex Trafficking Lawsuit After Minor Was Abused at Multiple Locations January 8, 2026
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)
Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: yesterday)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)
SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: 2 days ago)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)