Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
PFAS Risks From Firefighting Foam Were Known by 3M for Decades: Guardian Report Special report highlights how 3M knew PFAS in firefighting foam were not biodegradable as early as 1949, and that the chemicals were toxic by at least the 1970s. January 20, 2025 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Amid continuing concerns about the impact of widespread water contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) used in firefighting foam and other consumer products in recent decades, a new investigative report reveals that 3M Company has known about the environmental and health risks posed by the chemicals since the late 1940s, but kept that information from the public and federal regulators. PFAS were first discovered in the late 1930s, and are still widely used to resist grease, oil and water. Most notably, high volumes of the chemicals are contained in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), which firefighters have released into the environment while combating fuel-based fires, resulting in water contamination problems in a number of communities. In a report published by The Guardian on January 15, in cooperation with the environmental activist group Watershed Investigations, the contents of previously unseen corporate documents have been revealed, which show 3M knew that PFAS were not biodegradable for decades before admitting the problem with their product. PFAS Health Concerns The lack of biodegradability causes PFAS to build up and accumulate in the human body, animals and the environment, which is why they are now often referred to as “forever chemicals.” After PFAS have accumulated in the nation’s water supply and the bodies of millions of people, there is now increasing evidence that directly links the chemicals to a number of serious health concerns, including cancer risks, ulcerative colitis and other serious diseases. As more information has emerged about the PFAS risks, thousands of water contamination lawsuits have been filed against 3M Company, DuPont, Chemguard Inc., Tyco Fire Products and other companies, including personal injury claims brought by individuals diagnosed with cancer after drinking contaminated water, as well as firefighter cancer lawsuits brought by individuals directly exposed during training and response exercises. Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals? Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals? Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The Guardian and Watershed Investigations report indicates that 3M had evidence that PFAS were not biodegradable as early as 1949, but claimed until at least the 1990s that PFAS would break down due to natural processes. In 1979, 30 years after it had information to the contrary, 3M was still calling its AFFF products “environmentally neutral.” The uncovered documents repeatedly show that 3M, despite knowing PFAS were not completely biodegradable, encouraged the chemicals to be discharged into sewers, which has been blamed for causing the PFAS water contamination problems that plague the U.S. Critics have called that move a disaster, since the chemicals ended up being discharged from wastewater facilities, or added to sludge that was then spread on farm land, creating more vectors for the chemicals to infiltrate the nation’s water supply, the report indicates. The investigation uncovered reports from 1964, 1983 and more, which show 3M knew about the problem. However, much of that evidence did not come to light until 2018, when a PFAS lawsuit filed against 3M by the state of Minnesota ended in an $890 million settlement, and the documents were uncovered. Not only does the report indicate 3M knew the chemicals would not break down in nature, but that the manufacturer also knew the chemicals were toxic. Such admissions were found in company meeting minutes dating back to 1978, according to the report. PFAS Lawsuits Last year, a federal judge granted final approval for a PFAS settlement agreement of up to $12.5 billion between 3M and a number of water providers nationwide, who sued the company to recover the cost of cleaning the toxic chemicals from public water systems. However, there are still thousands of PFAS injury and exposure lawsuits filed against chemical manufacturers in the federal court system, which have been consolidated under U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in South Carolina, to reduce duplicative discovery and avoid conflicting pretrial rulings. As part of the coordinated management of the litigation, a small group of early PFAS contamination lawsuits are being prepared for trial dates starting later this year, involving claims that individuals developed testicular cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, thyroid cancer, thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis, after drinking water known to be contaminated with high levels of the chemicals. While the outcome of these early trial dates will not have any binding impact on other claims being pursued throughout the federal court system, they are designed to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation. Tags: 3M Company, AFFF, Cancer, Chemicals, Drinking Water, Firefighter Foam, PFAS, Water Contamination Find Out If You Qualify for A AFFF Lawsuit Settlement More Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Stories Link Between AFFF and Liver Cancer, Thyroid Cancer To Be Examined by MDL Court February 17, 2025 PFAS in Drinking Water Linked to Certain Forms of Cancer: Study January 16, 2025 New Study Links PFAS Exposure to Increased Brain Neurotoxicity January 7, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES New Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed Following Global Settlement (Posted: today) In the six months since a Bard hernia mesh settlement agreement was reached, at least two dozen new lawsuits have been brought, as the implants continue to fail and require revision surgery. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Surgery Malpractice Lawsuit Cleared To Move Forward Over Botched Procedure (03/21/2025)Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (03/14/2025)Covidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025) Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: yesterday) As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITCourt Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/26/2025)Group of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025) Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: 2 days ago) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
New Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed Following Global Settlement (Posted: today) In the six months since a Bard hernia mesh settlement agreement was reached, at least two dozen new lawsuits have been brought, as the implants continue to fail and require revision surgery. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Surgery Malpractice Lawsuit Cleared To Move Forward Over Botched Procedure (03/21/2025)Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (03/14/2025)Covidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)
Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: yesterday) As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITCourt Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/26/2025)Group of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: 2 days ago) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)