3M Combat Arms Earplug Settlement Identification Phase Complete, and Submission of Eligible Claimant Registration Forms Will Soon Begin

A federal judge has determined that process for identifying all potential claimants who may participate in a recent $6 billion 3M Combat Arms earplug lawsuit settlement agreement has been completed, and the next phase will soon begin, allowing plaintiffs to submit registration forms to obtain compensation for hearing loss and tinnitus injuries.

The settlement seeks to resolve nearly 300,000 product liability lawsuits brought against 3M Company by U.S. military veterans, who say they suffered permanent hearing damage due to alleged design defects with the company’s Combat Arms earplugs, which were standard military issue for all service members between 2003 and 2015.

The veterans claim 3M Company, and it’s Aero Technologies subsidiary, knew the earplugs failed to properly seal the ear canal, yet continued to sell their product to the U.S. government, causing service members to be left without adequate ear protection during combat and training exercises.

Given common questions of fact and law raised in the litigation, all claims brought throughout the federal court system have been centralized for the past three and a half years before U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.

Following a series of massive damage awards returned by juries in early cases that went to trial in the MDL, the manufacturer decided to pursue a controversial 3M earplug lawsuit bankruptcy plan last year, attempting to put its fully owned subsidiary Aearo Technologies into bankruptcy, even though 3M is a multi-billion dollar parent company that is well funded and directly profited from sale of the earplugs for years.

However, federal courts repeatedly shot down the earplug manufacturer’s attempts, saying the filings were not made in good faith, and that the company faced no financial distress from the lawsuits that would warrant bankruptcy protection.

3M Combat Arms Earplug Settlement

With thousands of potential trials likely to be scheduled over the next year, which could result in massive liability awards, 3M Company offered a $6 billion Combat Arms earplug lawsuit settlement (PDF) on August 28, which seeks to resolve the litigation and prevent the federal court system from being flooded with hundreds of thousands of trials in the coming years. However, there remain some questions about whether enough individual plaintiffs will agree to accept the settlement, which would be paid over the course of five years.

|
|

In the days after the settlement was announced, Judge Rodgers issued a case management order (PDF) detailing how the Court intended to protect plaintiffs from predatory settlement lending companies, which often advance money at extremely high interest rates once a settlement is announced. In addition, the Court also issued an order (PDF) describing how those who do not wish to participate in the settlement can proceed with individual lawsuits.

On September 23, the latest 3M earplug settlement update was issued by the Court, announcing in a case management order (PDF) that the identification phase of the program is now complete. Judge Rodgers indicated that the “process for Eligible Claimants to submit Registration Forms, including required signatures and attachments, will soon begin.”

Earplug Settlement Amount Concerns

While the parties move forward with the settlement claim process, there remain questions over whether enough veterans will approve of the deal to sign on.

Plaintiffs have six months from August 29 to accept or opt-out of the agreement, however some have questioned whether the settlement amount, which comes to about $24,000 per plaintiff paid out across five years, is adequate to address permanent hearing loss and tinnitus injuries. If less than 98% of plaintiffs agree to the settlement, the deal may fall apart.


56 Comments


  1. Brandi

    Can claims still be filed? I have horrible tinnitus and served 2003-2007.


  2. Quintin

    Yeah I think it’s b******* that they’re trying to stretch the payments out 5 years a lot of the veterans are messed up right now and they waited years already it doesn’t make sense if the case is finalized everybody’s papers are in all the documents that are needed are in just pay us our money up front one payment get it over with anything else is a game is real b******* you still can’t show your bedroom is no respect you can’t put them at the top of the list get things done a little more efficiently the same way you trained us to be y’all should be acting for us


  3. Elizabeth

    My husband received his settlement March 5,2024
    *Very pleased*
    Thank you
    Last Day to file was
    February 20, 2024.


  4. James

    Was in this lawsuit from the beginning. Artillery in combat and worked with EOD. Draw 10% from the VA for tinnitus and hearing loss. The VA is doing away with awarding Tinnitus awards. Rumored that this lawsuit is the root cause of it. Offered me 10 grand before the lawyers cut. While archer sent an additional email saying I could get up to 240,000 thousand due to my VA records showing hearing loss and Tinnitus awards. My lawyer’s tried to force me to take the 10 k. I replied with what archer sent and they said it would cost 1000.00 dollars or more for each category that I filed for which would be deducted from what I recieve from my settlement plus the 33% they charged for representing me in my case. You can sue your laywers also if the dont represent you or neglect your case.


  5. Bryan

    I feel in the future a bunch of lawsuits from veterans in this 3M settlement. The law firms are gouging us with attorney fees. I read one person got awarded 16K and only took home 4300$ that number doesn’t sound right. It’s only supposed to 40% and 9% for court fees. That person should have got awarded 8300$ not 4300$. So it seems to the law firms are getting paid out not us. Something isn’t jiving here.


  6. Joseph

    Does anyone know of a lawyer I could use to sue them on my own and not through the group lawsuit?


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025.
Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.
An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe.